miller Health Occupational Health and Fitness

Index

CMDBO JANUARY 2009

USEFUL LINKS

NEWSLETTER

FACT SHEETS

John Miller conducted a Health Management program for The Group in January 2008.

16 people, 10 men and 6 women completed the following profiles: -

■ Health, Fitness and Wellbeing

■ Musculo-skeletal risk

■ Diet

■ Chemical intake

■ Stress risk

■ Career satisfaction

The results are presented in graphic format, with commentary.

Click here to read what the assessments are all about

HEALTH, FITNESS AND WELLBEING PROFILE

The Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile provides people with a very good idea of how well the various systems of the body are functioning, particularly the

• the mind

• autonomic nervous system

• immune system

• digestive system

• circulatory system

• elimination system

• musculo-skeletal system.

	Symptom	None		Not much			A fair bit			A lot
1.	Headaches including migraines	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
2.	Lack of energy and vitality	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
3.	Candida - jock itch, thrush, tinea ...	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
4.	Poor sleep. If on tablets score 10	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
5.	Snoring &/or sleep apnoea. Score 10 if using a mask	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
6.	Crook back, stiff neck, sore shoulders, dicky knee RSI ...	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
7.	Frequent colds, flu, sinus	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
8.	Unsettled stomach, reflux (Score 10 if on medication)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
9.	Overweight - 1 point for every 2Kg	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
10.	Irritable bowel, constipation	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11.	Asthma	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
12.	Low level of aerobic fitness	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
13.	Chest pain, palpitations	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
14.	Rashes, itchiness, skin outbreaks, psoriasis ...	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
15.	Mouth ulcers, cold sores	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
16.	Elevated blood pressure. Score 0 on pills	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
17.	Elevated blood cholesterol. Score o if on pills	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
18.	Elevated blood glucose. Score 0 if on medication	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
19.	Shakes, nervous ticks, mannerisms	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
20.	Grinding teeth	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
21.	Alcoholic drinks per day (2 pts/drink)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
22.	Smoking. (1 pt/cigarette/day)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
23.	Caffeine (1 pt/cup per day)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
24.	Anxious about life, insecure, apprehensive	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
25.	Sad or depressed (On medication, score 0)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
26.	In wrong job for now	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
27.	Under-appreciated at work	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
28.	Have poor work/life balance	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
29.	Unhappy with family life	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
30.	Unhappy with financial status	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10

Score

The score of a normal, fit and healthy human being is less than 20

Higher scores are symptomatic of dysfunction of one or more body systems.

People with high levels of stress usually score well over 100.

For people with a score of more than 80, the ‘background noise’ of their life is becoming louder and louder. It is hard to concentrate on your work when body systems are dysfunctional.

We know a fit and healthy group when we see the majority of scores below 40. This was not the case with this group. By and large higher scores are usually a reflection of

• low levels of fitness

• an inability to deal with what life and work are serving up to people.

Remember, it is not what happens, but how we deal with what happens that determines our level of stress.

Classification of average scores: Excellent - less than 40. Good - 41 - 50. Fair 51-60. Poor - over 60.

This profile is described as good. The average score was 51. Anyone scoring more than 80 is putting up with a lot of 'background noise'.

HEALTH CLIMATE SURVEY

Based on scores received in the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile we've compiled a Health Climate Survey. Scores on each item have ranked - the higher the score the worse the problem. We added the scores for each item. The results appear in the table below.

Symptoms/issues/concerns	% of people scoring over 5
Overweight	44
Low level of fitness	31
Crook back, sore shoulders	25
Headaches	19
Poor sleep	19
Snoring, sleep apnoea	19
Shortness of breath from asthma	19
Lack of energy	13
Elevated blood pressure	13	2
Elevated cholesterol	13	2
Candida	6
Reflux, unsettled stomach	6
Irritable bowel, constipation etc	6
Itchy, rashes, psoriasis	6
Elevated glucose	6	1
Alcohol	6
Smoking	6
Caffeine	6
Anxious	6
Depressed	6	0
Work-life balance	6
Unhappy family life	6
Financial status	6
Frequent colds, flu, sinus	0
Chest pain, palpitations	0
Mouth ulcers	0
Shakes, nervous mannerisms	0
Grinding teeth	0
Wrong job	0
Under appreciated at work	0

We registered those scores of 5 and over as being a symptom, issue or concern, the most pressing of which have been highlighted.

Rarely have I seen so few issues/symptoms concerned that affected more that 20-% of people.

Based on this profile this is a pretty fit and healthy staff - but the more specific graphs below, dig down deeper into the health, fitness and wellbeing issues affecting people.

Perception

Based on people's perception (where they gave a particular symptom a score of 5 or more, and backed up by objective scores) the key issues are

•	Obesity 44% of people said they were more than 10Kg over weight. It's a symptom of metabolic dysfunction and relates to high energy diets and low energy lifestyles. It's suggestive of elevated levels of insulin floating around the body, which is a precursor of all manner of body system dysfunctions - elevated blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, elevated blood glucose. The recommendation, that people need to get more exercise (at lunch time) and eat from the top of the Hourglass.

•	Snoring Only 19% of people said they snored loudly enough for it to be a problem. The recipe for a good snore is to be male, be unfit and at least 20Kg over weight, to have high blood pressure, have a few drinks every night, be stressed out of their brain and sleep on their back.

•	Lack of energy Only 13% of people said they lacked energy. Low levels of energy come from many sources, including: - - lack of a good aerobic fitness training program - a diet high in wheat flour and sugar - dullness - ...

•	Fitness 31% said they were unfit. We recommend staff be given the greatest encouragement to leave the workplace at lunch time and get in some physical activity. One organisation we work for gives staff an hour and a half off for lunch, providing people exercise during that time. Fitness has a significant bearing on the scores for low levels of energy, poor sleep, snoring, depression and headaches.

•	Musculo-skeletal dysfunction Only 25% of people said they had some sort of musculo-skeletal dysfunction. Musculo-skeletal dysfunction goes with low levels of strength and flexibility. Those at greatest risk need encouragement to attend a strength and flexibility training program several times a week.

•	Rashes and itchiness Can be caused by a range of things: - - a body that's stressed producing too much cortisol - a toxic diet - a sluggish elimination system - itching to get away from something - ...

•	Headaches 19% of people said they regularly get headaches. Headaches are caused by - a diet high in wheat flour and sugar - caffeine withdrawal - lack of oxygen getting to the head - a sluggish elimination system - a head out of alignment due to tight and weak muscles - beating your head against a brick wall - ...

•	Colds and flu Symptom of a depressed immune system, one which can be strengthened by eating from the top of the Hourglass and getting plenty of aerobic exercise.

•	Under-appreciation at work Nobody said they were under-appreciated at work. This is a fantastic result. I've never seen this type of score. In other workplaces it can be 40% of people are under-appreciated. Manager and staff - take another bow.

•	Being in the wrong job Nobody of people said they were in the wrong job. There is usually a high and positive correlation between people being in the wrong job and people saying they are under-appreciated at work. In this case this rule applied. Nobody was in the wrong job and nobody was under-appreciated at work.

•	Diet A diet high in flour and sugar and low in fruit, vegetables and fibre leads to irritable and bowel, reflux.

	Depression and anxiety There is an epidemic of depression in our community and we encourage all organisations to target depression. 1 person gave themselves a score of 5 or more on the depression question, indicating risk that needs to be dealt with. No people were on anti-depressant medication. There is a significant core of depression that relates to poor health generally. All body systems are connected. The epidemic of depression will continue to escalate at the same rate as the epidemic of all other body system dysfunctions. People need to be given encouragement to exercise regularly and vigorous, eat less flour and sugar and imbibe less of the culturally chemicals - particularly nicotine, caffeine and alcohol. Because of the relationship of depression to fitness and diet there is a chance that some people have been misdiagnosed. Some aspects of depression relate to psychologically generated issues. It is important that these people be encouraged to have regular counselling - through the EAP or other counsellors - The best book about depression I've read, and what you can do about it, and one that I recommend highly is by psychiatrist, David Servan-Schreiber, Healing Without Freud or Prozac.

•	Blood pressure 2 people indicated they were on blood pressure medication. Blood pressure is a symptom of body system dysfunction relating directly to - lack of aerobic fitness - being over weight - being stressed.

•	Smoking There was 1 confirmed smoker. Now lets move heaven and earth to assist this person to give it away altogether.

•	Alcohol intake Only one person indicated a higher than acceptable level of alcohol consumption. For too many people it is culturally acceptable to drink half a dozen cans of beer a night. Not only does willpower dissolve in alcohol but it increases the size of the waist. I don't agree with the medical charities that you should have a drink every night. The people score lowest in the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile only have a couple of drinks a week, if that. The problem with alcohol is that will power dissolves in it. Once you've had one, you're more likely to have another, and another ... Then out come the chips and cashews, finishing off with a couple rounds of Tim Tams. You know there is something wrong when the junk medical industry is telling you to have a drink and take an Aspro every day.

FITNESS

The fitness profile is comprised of a mix of 10 objective and subjective assessments.

• Are you keeping yourself fit and healthy to the best of your ability?

• What was your score on the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile?

• Are you about your ideal weight?

• Aerobic fitness test

• Abdominal strength test

• Upper body strength test

• Flexibility test

• Mobility test

• Aerobic activity training behaviour

• Level of energy and vitality.

A reasonable score is over 70%.

Those receiving less than 70 are not training with sufficient vigour or intensity on a regular and systematic basis to keep themselves fit and healthy.


As a group this is an average sort of a profile. Too many people confess to not keeping themselves as fit and healthy as they would like.		As a group, the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing Profile scores were quite good.

As a group this is a better than normal result. However, on this estimation 68% were 10 or more kilos over their ideal weight. Being overweight greatly compromises mobility.		Not a good score. Only 1 person had a leg strength and mobility problem - due to injury.

A poor result. 2 people couldn't do 1 situp. 56% failed the test by being unable to complete 17 situps in 30 seconds.		A fair result. 6 people lacking in upper body strength - couldn't do 17 pressups.

4 people couldn't touch their toes. A poor result which leads to back, neck and shoulder dysfunction.		A pleasing result. With 1 exception people had no difficulty sitting on the floor and standing up again.

A good result, people are aerobically fitter than they thought. Person scoring '1' had an injury.		A pretty good result over-all.

As a group overall fitness - aerobic, strength and flexibility is a bit off the pace. 30% failed to pass the test.

Overall the fitness scores was 51.

MUSCULO-SKELETAL RISK FACTOR

Our musculo-skeletal risk factor profile looked at a range of parameters including mobility, strength and flexibility and whether people are training to keep themselves strong and flexible.

The musculo-skeletal risk factor profile is comprised of a mix of 7 objective and 3 subjective assessments.

• Current musculo-skeletal condition

• Abdominal strength test

• Upper body strength test

• Flexibility

• Functional mobility – the ability to sit down and stand up with ease.

• Shoulder function

• Dominant hand grip

• Non-dominant hand grip

• Flexibility training behaviour

• Strength training behaviour

A score of 70% is attainable by those who have a regular and systematic training program.

Those scoring less than 70 are not doing sufficient in the way of strength and flexibility exercises. They are therefore exposing themselves to a high risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction. (It would be bizarre for a workplace to offer to pay the rehabilitation costs of people who were not keeping themselves strong enough or flexible enough to do their job without succumbing to musculo-skeletal dysfunction, wouldn't it?)


Not a bad result, except 68% scored less than 7/10. They are experiencing some pain and discomfort, a couple of people a lot. Those scoring less the 6 need to be required attend a prehab/rehab program, for their own benefit and that of the organisation.		As a group this is a better than normal result. However, on this estimation 62% were 10 or more kilos over their ideal weight. Being overweight greatly compromises mobility.

Generally speaking a good result. Only 1 person with a knee injury performed poorly.		This is a poor result. 75% of people failed the test. 2 people couldn't do one sit up. This means that the strength of the muscles on the front of their body is not sufficient to keep their pelvis and spinal column in good alignment.

This is a mediocre result. 40% of people failed the test. Only 1 person couldn't do one press up. They are leaving themselves open to upper back, shoulder and arm dysfunction.		This is a mediocre result. 6 people couldn't touch their toes at all. 5 people could only just touch their toes. Too many people have tight muscles along the back side of their body - calves, hamstrings, buttock and back. It's caused by two things - sitting down and not having a flexibility program. There is a high risk of lower back, neck and shoulder dysfunction.

A good result. Only 1 person had difficulty getting down on the floor and back up again. Being overweight and having a game leg, bung hip and a crook back dramatically reduces mobility.		Patchy. 30% had dysfunctional shoulders. The good news is that's it's redeemable.

Its always the case, few people have a regular strength and flexibility program. The organisation needs to put in train a regular and systematic training program, on site, that includes 1. specialist prehab and rehab sessions for those at serious risk and those already dysfunctional. 2. daily 10 minute strength and flexibility sessions for all staff.

Average score: 56. Not good. The risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction is high due to low levels of strength and flexibility. There is a strong case for the organisation to implement an obligatory strength and flexibility program for those who scored less than 60 in this profile.

Lack of strength and flexibility is something that the Organisation needs to take seriously and monitor carefully and put in place an organisation-wide strategy to improve musculo-skeletal function. By far and away a high proportion of people do not have a strength and flexibility program. As a result they are getting weaker and tighter by the week, thereby exposing themselves and the organisation to risk.

When push comes to shove and people become dysfunctional, it will be The Organisation that ends up paying the high cost of an avoidable musculo-skeletal complaint. Click here to read the article from injury to dysfunction. Click here to read about swifties and fallacies.

In our opinion musculo-skeletal dysfunction caused by the lack of a regular and systematic strength and flexibility program cannot be classified as an injury. Responsibility for musculo-skeletal dysfunction needs to be sheeted home to individual employees, though it’s unlikely to happen without the establishment of a culture within the organisation that supports, values and understands strength and flexibility.

We recommend a range of strength and flexibility classes that are readily available Australia-wide: -

•	Posture and Flexibility
•	Yoga
•	Crookback Clinic
•	Tai Chi
•	Pontius Pilates

The Organisation would place itself in the forefront of OH&S practice if it took the musculo-skeletal risk seriously and moved heaven and earth to educate all staff about this risk and encourage them to take part in a regular strength and flexibility program. Maybe The Organisation and its worker's compensation insurer could invest in a pilot program to increase staff strength and flexibility!

The lack of strength and flexibility training coupled with poor abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility and shoulder function is a cause for concern and needs the attention of individual staff and managers.

Recommendation

We strongly recommend that the people who are in current poor musculo-skeletal condition, and who lack abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility, shoulder function and functional mobility, in particular those who scored less than 60 on the profile, be obligated to attend regular, in-house strength and flexibility classes.

The pressure on the organisation's workers' compensation costs is such that to do otherwise would, in our opinion be to abrogate a responsibility for the prudent management of the organisation's finances.

DIET PROFILE

The diet profile is designed to assist participants to check out whether they are eating wisely and also one which has appropriate amounts of carbohydrate, protein and fat. It also looks at various eating habits, eg eating too much, eating for comfort ...

• Closeness to ideal weight?

• Do you eat a decent breakfast?

• Do you eat a high fat diet?

• Do you eat a high starch diet?

• Do you eat from the top of the Diet Hourglass?

• How much water do you during each day?

• Do you supplement your diet with essential micro-nutrients – vitamins,

minerals, essential fats (omega 3) and glyco-proteins - and

nutraceuticals - ginko, aloe vera, Echinacea ...?

• Do you eat too much?

• Are you ruled by your addictions to fat, sugar and starch?

• Does the back end of your system work like a charm?

We use the Hourglass Diet as out eating model.

Low scores are usually symptomatic of high fat, high starch, low fibre diets. The results: - people become over fat and constipated.


	As a group this is a better than normal result. However, on this estimation 62% were 10 or more kilos over their ideal weight.	Too many people filling themselves up on flour and sugar at breakfast time. This is due to the Kellogification of our diets. The 'fat police' have just about stripped a decent cooked breakfast out of existence.

	If you're over weight you've either got a fat guts ...	or a starch guts, or a sugar guts or a beer guts.

	The nature of our culture is that it's too easy to eat junk food.	A few people are not drinking enough water. We're too affluent - we can afford to drink coffee, fruit juice, flavoured milk and carbonated drinks to slake our thirst; every thing but water. 'Water, water every where ...' but no-one wants to drink it!

	Unless you eat the perfect diet, there is a good case for supplementing one's diet. Our food lacks vitamins minerals and essential fats.	Not only do I fail to eat from the top of the Hourglass, I also eat too much. It's hard to satisfy the inner hunger by eating.

	There's an epidemic of food addiction, particularly to chocolate, cola drinks, cake, biscuits, ice-cream ...	Back end function depends on eating less fat, flour and sugar and more fruit, vegetables and fibre. Psyllium husk works a treat.
Patchy. Total score 60. A very average score. It's too easy to eat a high energy dense diet of manufactured food - particularly foods containing large amounts of fat, flour and sugar - food that comes in packets, tins, cans, bottles, cardboard boxes and plastic bags. This is a group that needs to design strategies to get more fruit, vegetables and water down their throat.

Australia is in a grip of an obesity and body system dysfunction epidemic generated by too much of the wrong food on the one hand, and too little of the right food on the other. It is my opinion that diets high in refined, cereal-based carbohydrates and sugar (the garbohydrates) are the suspects. Too few people seem to be aware that their level of body fat is affected by the amount of flour and sugar they take in each day. The high starch diet has replaced the high fat diet, with the same consequences. The garbohydrate diet stimulates insulin production which leads to fat gain, and all manner of metabolic dysfunctions.

Many people are unaware that they may be allergic or intolerant of some foods, particularly wheat flour, milk, deadly nightshades, chocolate, alcohol, caffeine, preservatives ...

Most people have a flour and sugar breakfast, attributed to the kelloggification of the Australian diet. You don't eat biscuits for lunch and dinner so why are you eating them for breakfast? The breakfast eating behaviour of Australians is dreadful. Few people have fruit. Even fewer have vegetables, or adequate protein and fat.

Few people take vitamin and mineral supplements. I believe there are good reasons to do so. If you don't believe me, I recommend you buy the book, What Your Doctor Doesn't Know About Nutrition May Be Killing You, by Ray Strand, MD.

By their own recognition a small number of people said they over-ate and were ruled by their addictions to junk food.

The operation of the back end of the system was only fair – low scores being reflective of a diet that lacks sufficient fibre.

CHEMICAL INTAKE PROFILE

The chemical profile focuses principally on the mix of culturally acceptable stimulants and depressants.

• Do you smoke?

• How many alcoholic drinks do you have a week?

• How much caffeine do you drink each day?

• Do you persistently feed a sweet tooth?

• Do you persistently feed a salt tooth?

• How many hours a week do you spend watching TV?

• Do you have a high intake of food additives?

• How do you rate your reliance on headache and pain-killing tablets?

• Are you on sleeping tablets or anti-depressants?

• Are you on diabetes or blood pressure mediation?


	1 person smoked.	Overall a good result (except for the person who has more than 20 drinks a week). As people become fitter the need for alcohol declines.

	Less is good.	Time to stop putting sugar in tea and coffee.

	No need to have extra salt on your food. We're getting enough out of packaged food as it is.	Hmmmmm. TV is robs some people of their time, their sleep and their vitality.

	An increasing number of people rely on anti-inflammatory drugs to mask the pain that goes with bones that are out of alignment.	Work out why you have headaches - tiredness, metabolic dysfunction, wheat flour, dehydration, resistance ...

	This is a very good score. No-one was on sleeping medication. Poor sleep is not caused by a lack of Stilnox! The first causality of anxiety is poor sleep. Find out the cause of the problem. Exercise more, drink less. Depression is not caused by a lack of Zoloft. Find and treat the cause of the problem - exercise more, change your diet, take more omega 3 fat and attend regular counselling.	Elevated blood pressure is another indication of metabolic dysfunction. 2 people are on blood pressure medication.

Average score: 79. Compared with other groups, this is a good result.

It is usually the case that fit and healthy people don’t drink to any great degree. In fact they only have one or two drinks per week.

However, we’ve well and truly entered the junk medical age when the medical priesthood is encouraging their clients to wash down an Aspro each day with a couple of glasses of claret, all in the name of good health! The people we see who are fittest and healthiest also have very low, or zero intakes of alcohol and coffee.

STRESS RISK PROFILE

Participants completed a simple stress and relaxation profile designed to assist them in making an assessment of how they were affected by stress. It is based on the habits of unstressed people.

If you do what unstressed people do you are less at risk of becoming stressed. I’m yet to see someone who said they were highly stressed or depressed who got a high score on this profile. A good score is over 70.

• How would you rate your current stress level

• Do you get a good night’s sleep?

• Do you take your holidays?

• Are you keeping yourself fit and healthy?

• Is there balance in your life?

• Do you take time off at lunch time?

• How many hours a week do you work?

• Are you good at giving back to your Self?

• Do you meditate?

• Are you happy with your family (and romantic) life?

The matter of stress always needs to be addressed by organisations as part of a personal development thrust, and aimed at all staff. If stress management type programs are to be conducted, all staff need to be involved, otherwise those at most risk and those who are currently most stressed (and too wrapped up in their own busyness) will not attend.

For those who spend long hours at work, I often wonder whether the behaviour is externally or internally driven. I suspect the latter. No body on their death bed ever said 'I wish I'd spent more time at the office.'

A few people are struggling with their family life. This is another fertile area for personal development and counseling programs. It's hard to concentrate at work when your home life is in turmoil

SCORING GUIDELINES

Excellent, scoring 8 or more

Good, scoring 7 or more

Fair, scoring 5 or 6

Poor, scoring less than 5

‘Pass mark’ on all parameters 7/10.


	With a couple of exceptions, this is a reasonable result.	This is a mediocre result. 50% of the group don't sleep as well as they would like. The first casualty of anxiety and low levels of fitness is sleep. The first causality of anxiety is poor sleep. Find out the cause of the problem. Exercise more, drink less.

	A poor result. Paul Pearsal in his book Superimmunity' said you need a 21 day away from home holiday every year.	Not a good result. Too many people are not keeping themselves in the shape they'd like to be in - and which they need to be in.

	This is a reasonable result.	A poor result. Too many people don't take time off to switch off and get outside in the fresh air. This is a reflection of poor management - personal and organisational

	This is a fair result. No one on their death bed ever said 'I wish I'd spent more time at the office.' The people working the longest hours are women with young children who have a shift before work, a shift at work, a shift after work and the graveyard shift as well.	Too many people are too busy to look after and nurture their Self.

	Very few people meditate. The reasons to do so are compelling.	Family life satisfaction is good for most people, but not for some.

Average score: 59. This is an average sort of a score. People could do more to look after their Self. I recommend that people scoring less that 50 spend time with a counselor or life coach, or go to a personal development weekend to get themselves centred and grounded on looking after their Self - start doing the things unstressed people do to avoid becoming stressed.

CAREER SATISFACTION PROFILE

The parameters in the profile relate to a mix of factors influences by the participant, management and their colleagues.

• How close are you to doing the job you’d really like to be doing?

• Are you in the right job for now?

• Is work giving you life or sucking life out of you?

• Are you focused on your career options?

• Do you get good feedback from your manager?

• Do you receive an appropriate financial reward?

• Do you feel you and your work are valued and appreciated?

• Do you work for an organisation that cares about people?

• Do you enjoy the company of the people you work with?

• What’s the level of morale like in your work group?

Normally, when results on the overall career profile are less than 70/100, people agree that they’re not in the right job. Certainly those scoring less than 60 have sufficient issues relating to career management as to seriously consider going somewhere else.

SCORING GUIDELINES

Excellent, scoring 8 or more

Good, scoring 7 or more

Fair, scoring 5 or 6

Poor, scoring less than 5

‘Pass mark’ on all parameters 7/10.


	This is an exceptionally score.	This is an exceptional result. You don't see many like this.

	Another good result. Work is probably about as stressful as you want it to be. Walk away. Make appointments for your Self that allow you to get on with your work unhindered by interruptions.	A good result. For those who scored 7/10 it didn't matter.

	This is a pretty good result. Of all our profile questions, this one is usually the worst answered. In this organisation there's some extra work for managers. For staff our recommendation is always to manage up. Take your manager out for morning tea once a month and talk about yourself and your work. Get some regular feedback. Don't wait for the big one at the end of the year. If you manager doesn't have time for you, get another one!	With a few exceptions, these people are pretty satisfied with what they sell themselves for. If you're not happy, you're selling yourself short. Log onto Seek and get your suit dry cleaned!

	This is a very good result. Work is valued and appreciated.	With a couple of exceptions, this is a good score. The aim is to have all staff recording a score of 7 or more.

	This is a very, very good score. People like working with each other. We rarely see scores like this.	Morale is very good. It's generally the case that our morale is good when my morale is good. The exceptions need to be dealt with.

Average score: 83. Compared with other groups, this is an exceptionally good result, in fact the best I've seen for donkey's ages. For the person who scored less than 70, there is the whiff of a suggestion they're not in the right job. The situation is certainly redeemable.

The Buddha and Confucius both said 'Find the job you'd love to do and you don't have to do another days work in your life.'

RECOMMENDATIONS

See the generic list of recommendations that cover all our profiles.