Index

145. CMSCGJ MARCH 2010

 

USEFUL LINKS

 

 

NEWSLETTER

 

 

FACT SHEETS

 

 

 

John Miller conducted a Health Management program for The Group in March 2010.

 

93 people, 58 men and 35 women completed the following profiles: -

 

Health, Fitness and Wellbeing

Musculo-skeletal risk

Diet

Chemical intake

Stress risk

Career satisfaction

 

The results are presented in graphic format, with commentary.

 

Click here to read what the assessments are all about  

 

HEALTH, FITNESS AND WELLBEING PROFILE

The Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile provides people with a very good idea of how well the various systems of the body are functioning, particularly the

 

•      the mind

•      autonomic nervous system

•      immune system

•      digestive system

•      circulatory system

•      elimination system

•      musculo-skeletal system.

 

 

 

Symptom

None

Not much

A fair bit

A lot

 
 

1.

Headaches including migraines

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

2.

Lack of energy and vitality

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

3.

Candida - jock itch, thrush, tinea ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

4.

Poor sleep. If on tablets score 10

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

5.

Snoring &/or sleep apnoea. Score 10 if using a mask

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

6.

Crook back, stiff neck, sore shoulders, dicky knee RSI ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

7.

Frequent colds, flu, sinus

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

8.

Unsettled stomach, reflux (Score 10 if on medication)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

9.

Overweight - 1 point for every 2Kg

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

10.

Irritable bowel, constipation

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

11.

Asthma

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

12.

Low level of aerobic fitness

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

13.

Chest pain, palpitations

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

14.

Rashes, itchiness, skin outbreaks, psoriasis ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

15.

Mouth ulcers, cold sores

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

16.

Elevated blood pressure. Score 0 on pills

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

17.

Elevated blood cholesterol. Score o if on pills

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

18.

Elevated blood glucose. Score 0 if on medication

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

19.

Shakes, nervous ticks, mannerisms

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

20.

Grinding teeth

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

21.

Alcoholic drinks per day (2 pts/drink)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

22.

Smoking. (1 pt/cigarette/day)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

23.

Caffeine (1 pt/cup per day)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

24.

Anxious about life, insecure, apprehensive

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

25.

Sad or depressed (On medication, score 0)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

26.

In wrong job for now

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

27.

Under-appreciated at work

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

28.

Have poor work/life balance

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

29.

Unhappy with family life

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

30.

Unhappy with financial status

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 

  Score

   

 

The score of a normal, fit and healthy human being is less than 20        

 

Higher scores are symptomatic of dysfunction of one or more body systems.

 

People with high levels of stress usually score well over 100.

 

For people with a score of more than 80, the ‘background noise’ of their life is becoming louder and louder. It is hard to concentrate on your work when body systems are dysfunctional.

 

We know a fit and healthy group when we see the majority of scores below 40. This was not the case with this group. By and large higher scores are usually a reflection of

 

•      low levels of fitness

•      an inability to deal with what life and work are serving up to people.

 

Remember, it is not what happens, but how we deal with what happens that determines our level of stress. 

 

Classification of average scores: Excellent - less than 40. Good - 41 - 50. Fair 51-60. Poor - over 60.

 

This profile is described as poor. The average score was 61. Anyone scoring more than 80 is putting up with a lot of 'background noise'.

 

HEALTH CLIMATE SURVEY

Based on scores received in the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile we've compiled a Health Climate Survey. Scores on each item have ranked - the higher the score the worse the problem. We added the scores for each item. The results appear in the table below.

 

Symptoms / issues / concerns

Percentage scoring 5 or more

on a particular item

People

scoring 10

 

Low level of fitness

49    

Overweight

43 16: 20Kg plus  

Crook back, sore shoulders

42    

Poor sleep

39    

Under appreciated at work

32 11  

Financial status

31    

Snoring, sleep apnoea

28    

Lack of energy

27    

Work-life balance

27    

Alcohol

25    

Elevated blood pressure

24 13  

Anxious

20    

Depressed

16 3  

Frequent colds, flu, sinus

15    

Reflux, unsettled stomach

15    

Headaches

14    

Smoking

14    

Wrong job

14    

Itchy, rashes, psoriasis

12    

Irritable bowel, constipation etc

10    

Caffeine

9    

Elevated cholesterol

8 2  

Unhappy family life

8    

Shortness of breath from asthma

6    

Chest pain, palpitations

6    

Grinding teeth

6    

Candida

5    

Elevated glucose

5    

Mouth ulcers

3    

Shakes, nervous mannerisms

0    

 

We registered those scores of 5 and over as being a symptom, issue or concern, the most pressing of which have been highlighted.

 

Perception

Based on people's perception (where they gave a particular symptom a score of 5 or more, and backed up by objective scores) the key issues are

 

•

Fitness

49% said they were unfit. We recommend staff be given the greatest encouragement to leave the workplace at lunch time and get in some physical activity. One organisation we work for gives staff an hour and a half off for lunch, providing people exercise during that time.

 

Fitness has a significant bearing on the scores for low levels of energy, poor sleep, snoring, depression and headaches.

 

 

•

 

Obesity

43% of people said they were more than 10Kg over weight. On their own admission, 16 people were more than 20Kg overweight. It's a symptom of metabolic dysfunction and relates to high energy diets and low energy lifestyles. It's suggestive of elevated levels of insulin floating around the body, which is a precursor of all manner of body system dysfunctions - elevated blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, elevated blood glucose.

 

The recommendation, that people need to get more exercise (at lunch time) and eat from the top of the Hourglass.

 

 

•

Musculo-skeletal dysfunction

42% of people said they had some sort of musculo-skeletal dysfunction.

 

Musculo-skeletal dysfunction goes with low levels of strength and flexibility. Those at greatest risk need encouragement to attend a strength and flexibility training program several times a week.

 

 

•

Snoring

28% of people said they snored loudly enough for it to be a problem.

 

The recipe for a good snore is to be male, be unfit and at least 20Kg over weight, to have high blood pressure, have a few drinks every night, be stressed out of their brain and sleep on their back.

   

•

 

Lack of energy

27% of people said they lacked energy. If you want more energy, use more up - then it comes back to you.

 

Low levels of energy come from many sources, including: -

-  lack of a good aerobic fitness training program

-  a diet high in wheat flour and sugar

-  dullness

-  ...

 

 

•

 

Colds and flu

15%. Symptom of a depressed immune system, one which can be strengthened by eating from the top of the Hourglass and getting plenty of aerobic exercise.

 

 

•

Under-appreciation at work

32% said they were under-appreciated at work.

 

This is a poor result. Manager and staff - have a big think about what can be done to improve this score.

 

 

•

Being in the wrong job

14% of people said they were in the wrong job.

 

There is usually a high and positive correlation between people being in the wrong job and people saying they are under-appreciated at work. In this case this was not the cased. Few people are in the wrong job but too many people feel they are under-appreciated at work.

 

 

•

Diet

A diet high in flour and sugar and low in fruit, vegetables and fibre leads to irritable and bowel, reflux.

 

 

 

Depression and anxiety

There is an epidemic of depression in our community and we encourage all organisations to target depression. 15 people gave themselves a score of 5 or more on the depression question, indicating risk that needs to be dealt with.

 

3 people were on anti-depressant medication.

 

There is a significant core of depression that relates to poor health generally.

 

All body systems are connected. The epidemic of depression will continue to escalate at the same rate as the epidemic of all other body system dysfunctions. People need to be given encouragement to exercise regularly and vigorous, eat less flour and sugar and imbibe less of the culturally chemicals - particularly nicotine, caffeine and alcohol.

 

Because of the relationship of depression to fitness and diet there is a chance that some people have been misdiagnosed.

 

Some aspects of depression relate to psychologically generated issues. It is important that these people be encouraged to have regular counselling - through the EAP or other counsellors -

 

The best book about depression I've read, and what you can do about it, and one that I recommend highly is by psychiatrist, David Servan-Schreiber, Healing Without Freud or Prozac.

 

 

•

Blood pressure

13 people indicated they were on blood pressure medication.

 

Blood pressure is a symptom of body system dysfunction relating directly to

 

- lack of aerobic fitness

- being over weight

- being stressed.

 

 

•

Smoking

There were 13 confirmed smokers. It's a lower score than I would have expected for a group like this, so it's a pleasing result. BUT, lets move heaven and earth to assist these people to give it away altogether.

   

•

Alcohol intake

25 people indicated a higher than acceptable level of alcohol consumption. For too many people it is culturally acceptable to drink half a dozen cans of beer a night. Not only does willpower dissolve in alcohol but it increases the size of the waist.

 

I don't agree with the medical charities that you should have a drink every night. The people score lowest in the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile only have a couple of drinks a week, if that.

 

The problem with alcohol is that will power dissolves in it. Once you've had one, you're more likely to have another, and another ... Then  out come the chips and cashews, finishing off with a couple rounds of Tim Tams.

 

You know there is something wrong when the junk medical industry is telling you to have a drink and take an Aspro every day.

 

MUSCULO-SKELETAL RISK FACTOR

Our musculo-skeletal risk factor profile looked at a range of parameters including mobility, strength and flexibility and whether people are training to keep themselves strong and flexible.

 

The musculo-skeletal risk factor profile is comprised of a mix of 7 objective and 3 subjective assessments.

•      Current musculo-skeletal condition

•      Abdominal strength test

•      Upper body strength test

•      Flexibility

•      Functional mobility – the ability to sit down and stand up with ease.

•      Shoulder function

•      Dominant hand grip

•      Non-dominant hand grip

•      Flexibility training behaviour

•      Strength training behaviour

 

A score of 70% is attainable by those who have a regular and systematic training program.

 

Those scoring less than 70 are not doing sufficient in the way of strength and flexibility exercises. They are therefore exposing themselves to a high risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction. (It would be bizarre for a workplace to wait for someone with a personally generated musculo-skeletal dysfunction to file a claim for a work-related incident and then be forced into paying 100% of the rehab costs wouldn't it?)

 

 

Not a particularly good result. Nearly 50% of people have some serious musculo-skeletal issues. They are experiencing some pain and discomfort, 3 people a lot. Those scoring less the 6 need to be required attend a prehab/rehab program, for their own benefit and that of the organisation. We rate the organisation's risk as HIGH.

 

As a group this is a patchy result. However, on this estimation 40% were 10 or more kilos over their ideal weight. Being overweight greatly compromises mobility.

 

Good result - except for the 11 people who had crook knees of hips or were too weak to do a squat.

 

A poor result. Over half the participants failed the test by being unable to complete 17 situps in 30 seconds.

 

A poor result. More than half the people were lacking in upper body strength - couldn't do 17 pressups.

 

 

16 people couldn't touch their toes. A poor result which leads to back, neck and shoulder dysfunction.

 

A patchy result. With 21 had difficulty sitting on the floor and standing up again. Being over weight dramatically reduced mobility as does a lack of strength.

 

50% of people failed to achieve an acceptable level of shoulder function (7/10). The good news is that's it's redeemable.

 

Its always the case, few people have a regular strength and flexibility program. The organisation needs to put in train a regular and systematic training program, on site, that includes

 

1.  specialist prehab and rehab sessions for those at serious risk and those already dysfunctional.

 

2.  daily 10 minute strength and flexibility sessions for all staff.

Average score: 55. Not good. The risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction is high due to low levels of strength and flexibility. There is a strong case for the organisation to implement an obligatory strength and flexibility program for those who scored less than 60 in this profile.

 

Lack of strength and flexibility is something that the Organisation needs to take seriously and monitor carefully and put in place an organisation-wide strategy to improve musculo-skeletal function. By far and away a high proportion of people do not have a strength and flexibility program. As a result they are getting weaker and tighter by the week, thereby exposing themselves and the organisation to risk.

 

When push comes to shove and people become dysfunctional, it will be The Organisation that ends up paying the high cost of an avoidable musculo-skeletal complaint. Click here to read the article from injury to dysfunction. Click here to read about swifties and fallacies.

 

In our opinion musculo-skeletal dysfunction caused by the lack of a regular and systematic strength and flexibility program cannot be classified as an injury. Responsibility for musculo-skeletal dysfunction needs to be sheeted home to individual employees, though it’s unlikely to happen without the establishment of a culture within the organisation that supports, values and understands strength and flexibility.

 

We recommend a range of strength and flexibility classes that are readily available Australia-wide: -

 

•

Posture and Flexibility

•

Yoga

•

Crookback Clinic

•

Tai Chi

•

Pontius Pilates

 

The Organisation  would place itself in the forefront of OH&S practice if it took the musculo-skeletal risk seriously and moved heaven and earth to educate all staff about this risk and encourage them to take part in a regular strength and flexibility program. Maybe The Organisation and its worker's compensation insurer could invest in a pilot program to increase staff strength and flexibility!

 

The lack of strength and flexibility training coupled with poor abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility and shoulder function is a cause for concern and needs the attention of individual staff and managers.  

Recommendation

We strongly recommend that the people who are in current poor musculo-skeletal condition, and who lack abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility, shoulder function and functional mobility, in particular those who scored less than 60 on the profile, be obligated to attend regular, in-house strength and flexibility classes.

The pressure on the organisation's workers' compensation costs is such that to do otherwise would, in our opinion be to abrogate a responsibility for the prudent management of the organisation's finances.