miller Health Occupational Health and Fitness

Index

147_CTJS_APRIL_ 2010

USEFUL LINKS

NEWSLETTER

FACT SHEETS

John Miller conducted a Health Management program for The Group in April 2010.

123 people, 71 men and 52 women completed the following profiles: -

■ Health, Fitness and Wellbeing

■ Musculo-skeletal risk

■ Diet

■ Chemical intake

■ Stress risk

■ Career satisfaction

The results are presented in graphic format, with commentary.

Click here to read what the assessments are all about

HEALTH, FITNESS AND WELLBEING PROFILE

The Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile provides people with a very good idea of how well the various systems of the body are functioning, particularly the

• the mind

• autonomic nervous system

• immune system

• digestive system

• circulatory system

• elimination system

• musculo-skeletal system.

	Symptom	None		Not much			A fair bit			A lot
1.	Headaches including migraines	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
2.	Lack of energy and vitality	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
3.	Candida - jock itch, thrush, tinea ...	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
4.	Poor sleep. If on tablets score 10	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
5.	Snoring &/or sleep apnoea. Score 10 if using a mask	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
6.	Crook back, stiff neck, sore shoulders, dicky knee RSI ...	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
7.	Frequent colds, flu, sinus	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
8.	Unsettled stomach, reflux (Score 10 if on medication)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
9.	Overweight - 1 point for every 2Kg	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
10.	Irritable bowel, constipation	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11.	Asthma	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
12.	Low level of aerobic fitness	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
13.	Chest pain, palpitations	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
14.	Rashes, itchiness, skin outbreaks, psoriasis ...	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
15.	Mouth ulcers, cold sores	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
16.	Elevated blood pressure. Score 0 on pills	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
17.	Elevated blood cholesterol. Score o if on pills	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
18.	Elevated blood glucose. Score 0 if on medication	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
19.	Shakes, nervous ticks, mannerisms	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
20.	Grinding teeth	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
21.	Alcoholic drinks per day (2 pts/drink)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
22.	Smoking. (1 pt/cigarette/day)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
23.	Caffeine (1 pt/cup per day)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
24.	Anxious about life, insecure, apprehensive	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
25.	Sad or depressed (On medication, score 0)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
26.	In wrong job for now	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
27.	Under-appreciated at work	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
28.	Have poor work/life balance	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
29.	Unhappy with family life	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
30.	Unhappy with financial status	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10

Score

The score of a normal, fit and healthy human being is less than 20

Higher scores are symptomatic of dysfunction of one or more body systems.

People with high levels of stress usually score well over 100.

For people with a score of more than 80, the ‘background noise’ of their life is becoming louder and louder. It is hard to concentrate on your work when body systems are dysfunctional.

We know a fit and healthy group when we see the majority of scores below 40. This was not the case with this group. By and large higher scores are usually a reflection of

• low levels of fitness

• an inability to deal with what life and work are serving up to people.

Remember, it is not what happens, but how we deal with what happens that determines our level of stress.

Classification of average scores: Excellent - less than 40. Good - 41 - 50. Fair 51-60. Poor - over 60.

This profile is described as fair. The average score was 57. Anyone scoring more than 80 is putting up with a lot of 'background noise'.

HEALTH CLIMATE SURVEY

Based on scores received in the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile we've compiled a Health Climate Survey. Scores on each item have ranked - the higher the score the worse the problem. We added the scores for each item. The results appear in the table below.

Symptoms/ issues / concerns	% of people scoring over 5	Number of people scoring 10
Overweight	34	20
Low level of fitness	33
Poor sleep	29
Musculo-skeletal dysfunction	28
Under appreciated at work	28	2
Lack of Energy	23
Wrong job	22
Anxious	21
Work-life balance	21
Financial status	17
Headaches	16
Snoring, sleep apnoea	15
Depressed	14	6
Reflux, unsettled stomach	13	4
Itchy, rashes, psoriasis	12
Elevated blood pressure	12	7
Excessive alcohol intake	12	1
Irritable bowel, constipation etc	11
Frequent colds, flu, sinus	11
Caffeine	10
Grinding teeth	9
Smoking	8
Shortness of breath from asthma	7
Elevated cholesterol	6	3
Elevated glucose	5	2
Furry tongue, thrush, tinea,	4
Shakes, nervous mannerisms	4
Unhappy family life	4
Chest pain, palpitations	2
Mouth ulcers	1

We registered those scores of 5 and over as being a symptom, issue or concern, the most pressing of which have been highlighted.

Perception

Based on people's perception (where they gave a particular symptom a score of 5 or more, and backed up by objective scores) the key issues are

•	Obesity 34% of people said they were more than 10Kg over weight. 20 were more than 20Kg over weight. It's a symptom of metabolic dysfunction and relates to high energy diets and low energy lifestyles. It's suggestive of elevated levels of insulin floating around the body, which is a precursor of all manner of body system dysfunctions - elevated blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, elevated blood glucose. The recommendation; that people need to get more exercise (at lunch time) and eat from the top of the Hourglass.

•	Fitness 33% said they were unfit. We recommend staff be given the greatest encouragement to leave the workplace at lunch time and get in some physical activity. One organisation we work for gives staff an hour and a half off for lunch, providing people exercise during that time. Fitness has a significant bearing on the scores for low levels of energy, poor sleep, snoring, depression and headaches.

•	Musculo-skeletal dysfunction 28% of people said they had some sort of musculo-skeletal dysfunction. This is low compared with other groups. In the community generally it is over 50%. Musculo-skeletal dysfunction goes with low levels of strength and flexibility. Those at greatest risk need encouragement to attend a strength and flexibility training program several times a week.

•	Lack of energy 23% of people said they lacked energy. Low levels of energy come from many sources, including: - - lack of a good aerobic fitness training program - a diet high in wheat flour and sugar - family responsibilities, particularly for women with young children - dullness - ...

•	Under-appreciation at work 28% said they were under-appreciated at work. Whilst not as bad as some of the organisations we survey, this is a poor result. Manager and staff - have a big think about what can be done to improve this score.

•	Being in the wrong job 22% of people said they were in the wrong job. Again, this was a lower result than we see in some organisations, but being over 20% is a concern. There is usually a high and positive correlation between people being in the wrong job and people saying they are under-appreciated at work. In this case this rule applied. Too many people in the wrong job and too many people under-appreciated at work.

	Depression and anxiety There is an epidemic of depression in our community and we encourage all organisations to target depression. 21% people gave themselves a score of 5 or more on anxiety question, indicating a risk that needs to be dealt with. 6 people were on anti-depressant medication. There is a significant core of depression that relates to poor health generally. All body systems are connected. The epidemic of depression will continue to escalate at the same rate as the epidemic of all other body system dysfunctions. People need to be given encouragement to exercise regularly and vigorous, eat less flour and sugar and imbibe less of the culturally chemicals - particularly nicotine, caffeine and alcohol. Because of the relationship of depression to fitness and diet there is a chance that some people have been misdiagnosed. Some aspects of depression relate to psychologically generated issues. It is important that these people be encouraged to have regular counselling - through the EAP or other counsellors - The best book about depression I've read, and what you can do about it, and one that I recommend highly is by psychiatrist, David Servan-Schreiber, Healing Without Freud or Prozac.

•	Blood pressure 7 people indicated they were on blood pressure medication. Blood pressure is a symptom of body system dysfunction relating directly to - lack of aerobic fitness - being over weight - being stressed.

FITNESS

The fitness profile is comprised of a mix of 10 objective and subjective assessments.

• Are you keeping yourself fit and healthy to the best of your ability?

• What was your score on the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile?

• Are you about your ideal weight?

• Leg strength

• Abdominal strength test

• Upper body strength test

• Flexibility test

• Mobility test

• Aerobic fitness

• Level of energy and vitality.

A reasonable score is over 70%.

Those receiving less than 70 are not training with sufficient vigour or intensity on a regular and systematic basis to keep themselves fit and healthy.


As a group this is a very average sort of a profile. Too many people confess to not keeping themselves as fit and healthy as they would like.		As a group, the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing Profile scores were patchy. A lot of people are putting up with a lot of background noise.

As a group this is a patchy result. However, on this estimation 40% were 10 or more kilos over their ideal weight. Being overweight greatly compromises mobility. 15% were more than 20Kg over weight.		A good score, but, 10 people couldn't do 1 squat.

A patchy result. Nearly half the participants failed the test by being unable to complete 17 situps in 30 seconds.		A fair result, but 40% of people were lacking in upper body strength - they couldn't do 17 pressups.

21 people couldn't touch their toes. A poor result which leads to back, neck and shoulder dysfunction.		A pleasing result. With few exceptions post people had no difficulty sitting on the floor and standing up again.

A pretty good result. It's the sort of test though where every one should be able to get to 36 laps in 5 minutes.		A patchy result. Low levels of fitness: low levels of energy and vitality.

Overall the fitness scores was 67. As a group overall fitness - aerobic, strength and flexibility is a bit off the pace. 45% failed to pass the test.

MUSCULO-SKELETAL RISK FACTOR

Our musculo-skeletal risk factor profile looked at a range of parameters including mobility, strength and flexibility and whether people are training to keep themselves strong and flexible.

The musculo-skeletal risk factor profile is comprised of a mix of 7 objective and 3 subjective assessments.

• Current musculo-skeletal condition

• Closeness to ideal weight

• Leg strength

• Abdominal strength test

• Upper body strength test

• Flexibility

• Functional mobility – the ability to sit down and stand up with ease.

• Shoulder function

• Flexibility training behaviour

• Strength training behaviour

A score of 70% is attainable by those who have a regular and systematic training program.

Those scoring less than 70 are not doing sufficient in the way of strength and flexibility exercises. They are therefore exposing themselves to a high risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction. (It would be bizarre for a workplace to offer to pay the rehabilitation costs of people who were not keeping themselves strong enough or flexible enough to do their job without succumbing to musculo-skeletal dysfunction, wouldn't it?)


A fair result but the tail is too long. Nearly 30% of people have some serious musculo-skeletal issues. They are experiencing some pain and discomfort, 15 people a lot. Those scoring less than 6 need to be required attend a prehab/rehab program, for their own benefit and that of the organisation. We rate the organisation's risk as HIGH.		As a group this is a patchy result. However, on this estimation 40% were 10 or more kilos over their ideal weight. Being overweight greatly compromises mobility. 15% were more than 20Kg over weight.

Good result.		A patchy result. Nearly half the participants failed the test by being unable to complete 17 situps in 30 seconds.

AA fair result, but 40% of people were lacking in upper body strength - they couldn't do 17 pressups.		21 people couldn't touch their toes. A poor result which leads to back, neck and shoulder dysfunction.

A pleasing result. With few exceptions post people had no difficulty sitting on the floor and standing up again.		With a few exceptions, not too bad. The good news is that it's redeemable.

Its always the case, few people have a regular strength and flexibility program. The organisation needs to put in train a regular and systematic training program, on site, that includes 1. specialist prehab and rehab sessions for those at serious risk and those already dysfunctional. 2. daily 10 minute strength and flexibility sessions for all staff.

Average score: 63. Fair. The risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction is high due to low levels of strength and flexibility. There is a strong case for the organisation to implement an obligatory strength and flexibility program for those who scored less than 60 in this profile.

Lack of strength and flexibility is something that the Organisation needs to take seriously and monitor carefully and put in place an organisation-wide strategy to improve musculo-skeletal function. By far and away a high proportion of people do not have a strength and flexibility program. As a result they are getting weaker and tighter by the week, thereby exposing themselves and the organisation to risk.

When push comes to shove and people become dysfunctional, it will be The Organisation that ends up paying the high cost of an avoidable musculo-skeletal incident. Click here to read the article from injury to dysfunction. Click here to read about swifties and fallacies.

In our opinion musculo-skeletal dysfunction caused by the lack of a regular and systematic strength and flexibility program cannot be classified as an injury. Responsibility for musculo-skeletal dysfunction needs to be sheeted home to individual employees, though it’s unlikely to happen without the establishment of a culture within the organisation that supports, values and understands strength and flexibility.

We recommend a range of strength and flexibility classes that are readily available Australia-wide: -

•	Posture and Flexibility
•	Yoga
•	Crookback Clinic
•	Tai Chi
•	Pontius Pilates

The Organisation would place itself in the forefront of OH&S practice if it took the musculo-skeletal risk seriously and moved heaven and earth to educate all staff about this risk and encourage them to take part in a regular strength and flexibility program. Maybe The Organisation and its worker's compensation insurer could invest in a pilot program to increase staff strength and flexibility!

The lack of strength and flexibility training coupled with poor abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility and shoulder function is a cause for concern and needs the attention of individual staff and managers.

Recommendation

We strongly recommend that the people who are in current poor musculo-skeletal condition, and who lack abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility, shoulder function and functional mobility, in particular those who scored less than 60 on the profile, be obligated to attend regular, in-house strength and flexibility classes.

The pressure on the organisation's workers' compensation costs is such that to do otherwise would, in our opinion be to abrogate a responsibility for the prudent management of the organisation's finances.

DIET PROFILE

The diet profile is designed to assist participants to check out whether they are eating wisely and also one which has appropriate amounts of carbohydrate, protein and fat. It also looks at various eating habits, eg eating too much, eating for comfort ...

• Closeness to ideal weight?

• Do you eat a decent breakfast?

• Do you eat a high fat diet?

• Do you eat a high starch diet?

• Do you eat from the top of the Diet Hourglass?

• How much water do you during each day?

• Do you supplement your diet with essential micro-nutrients – vitamins,

minerals, essential fats (omega 3) and glyco-proteins - and

nutraceuticals - ginko, aloe vera, Echinacea ...?

• Do you eat too much?

• Are you ruled by your addictions to fat, sugar and starch?

• Does the back end of your system work like a charm?

We use the Hourglass Diet as out eating model.

Low scores are usually symptomatic of high fat, high starch, low fibre diets. The results: - people become over fat and constipated.


	As a group this is a patchy result. However, on this estimation 40% were 10 or more kilos over their ideal weight. Being overweight greatly compromises mobility. 15% were more than 20Kg over weight.	This is a reasonable result. Those scoring less than 6 are those who either have little or no breakfast or fill themselves up with flour and sugar. This is due to the Kellogification of our diets. The 'fat police' have just about stripped a decent cooked breakfast out of existence.

	If you're over weight you've either got a fat guts ...	or a flour guts, or a sugar guts or a beer guts.

	The nature of our culture is that it's too easy to eat junk food.	A few people are not drinking enough water. We're too affluent - we can afford to drink coffee, fruit juice, flavoured milk and carbonated drinks to slake our thirst; every thing but water. 'Water, water every where ...' but no-one wants to drink it!

	Unless you eat the perfect diet, there is a good case for supplementing one's diet. Our food lacks vitamins minerals and essential fats.	Not only do I fail to eat from the top of the Hourglass, I also eat too much. It's hard to satisfy the inner hunger by eating.

	There's an epidemic of food addiction, particularly to chocolate, cola drinks, cake, biscuits, ice-cream ... This group is not immune from that epidemic.	Back end function depends on eating less fat, flour and sugar and more fruit, vegetables and fibre. Psyllium husk works a treat.

Patchy. Total score 65. A very average sort of a score. It's too easy to eat a high energy dense diet of manufactured food - particularly foods containing large amounts of fat, flour and sugar - food that comes in packets, tins, cans, bottles, cardboard boxes and plastic bags. This is a group that needs to design strategies to get more fruit, vegetables and water down their throat.

Australia is in a grip of an obesity and body system dysfunction epidemic generated by too much of the wrong food on the one hand, and too little of the right food on the other. It is my opinion that diets high in refined, cereal-based carbohydrates and sugar (the garbohydrates) are the suspects. Too few people seem to be aware that their level of body fat is affected by the amount of flour and sugar they take in each day. The high starch diet has replaced the high fat diet, with the same consequences. The garbohydrate diet stimulates insulin production which leads to fat gain, and all manner of metabolic dysfunctions.

Many people are unaware that they may be allergic or intolerant of some foods, particularly wheat flour, milk, deadly nightshades, chocolate, alcohol, caffeine, preservatives ...

Most people have a flour and sugar breakfast, attributed to the kelloggification of the Australian diet. You don't eat biscuits for lunch and dinner so why are you eating them for breakfast? The breakfast eating behaviour of Australians is dreadful. Few people have fruit. Even fewer have vegetables, or adequate protein and fat.

Few people take vitamin and mineral supplements. I believe there are good reasons to do so. If you don't believe me, I recommend you buy the book, What Your Doctor Doesn't Know About Nutrition May Be Killing You, by Ray Strand, MD.

By their own recognition a small number of people said they over-ate and were ruled by their addictions to junk food.

The operation of the back end of the system was only fair – low scores being reflective of a diet that lacks sufficient fibre.

CHEMICAL INTAKE PROFILE

The chemical profile focuses principally on the mix of culturally acceptable stimulants and depressants.

• Do you smoke?

• How many alcoholic drinks do you have a week?

• How much caffeine do you drink each day?

• Do you persistently feed a sweet tooth?

• Do you persistently feed a salt tooth?

• How many hours a week do you spend watching TV?

• Do you have a high intake of food additives?

• How do you rate your reliance on headache and pain-killing tablets?

• Are you on sleeping tablets or anti-depressants?

• Are you on diabetes or blood pressure mediation?


	13 person smoked some not much. Probably only half a dozen were hard core smokers having more than 10 a day. It's roughly 10%of the staff when the community average is closer to 20%. No let's move heaven and earth to get those people to drop the habit altogether.	A good result. As people become fitter the need for alcohol declines.

	Less is good.	Time to hold back on the shaker!

	An increasing number of people rely on anti-inflammatory drugs to mask the pain that goes with bones that are out of alignment.	Work out why you have headaches - tiredness, metabolic dysfunction, wheat flour, dehydration, resistance ...

	With 1 exception, this is a very good score. Poor sleep is not caused by a lack of Stilnox! The first causality of anxiety is poor sleep. Find out the cause of the problem. Exercise more, drink less alcohol.	6 people were on anti-depressant medication. Without making light of the black dog of clinical depression, depression is not caused by a lack of Zoloft!

	Elevated blood pressure is another indication of metabolic dysfunction. 9 people are on blood pressure medication.	3 people were on diabetes medication - one of the major symptoms of metabolic dysfunction.

Average score: 87. Compared with other groups, this is a good result.

It is usually the case that fit and healthy people don’t drink to any great degree. In fact they only have one or two drinks per week.

However, we’ve well and truly entered the junk medical age when the medical priesthood is encouraging their clients to wash down an Aspro each day with a couple of glasses of claret, all in the name of good health! The people we see who are fittest and healthiest also have very low, or zero intakes of alcohol and coffee.

STRESS RISK PROFILE

Participants completed a simple stress and relaxation profile designed to assist them in making an assessment of how they were affected by stress. It is based on the habits of unstressed people.

If you do what unstressed people do you are less at risk of becoming stressed. I’m yet to see someone who said they were highly stressed or depressed who got a high score on this profile. A good score is over 70.

• How would you rate your current stress level

• Do you get a good night’s sleep?

• Do you take your holidays?

• Are you keeping yourself fit and healthy?

• Is there balance in your life?

• Do you take time off at lunch time?

• How many hours a week do you work?

• Are you good at giving back to your Self?

• Do you meditate?

• Are you happy with your family (and romantic) life?

The matter of stress always needs to be addressed by organisations as part of a personal development thrust, and aimed at all staff. If stress management type programs are to be conducted, all staff need to be involved, otherwise those at most risk and those who are currently most stressed (and too wrapped up in their own busyness) will not attend.

For those who spend long hours at work, I often wonder whether the behaviour is externally or internally driven. I suspect the latter. No body on their death bed ever said 'I wish I'd spent more time at the office.'

A few people are struggling with their family life. This is another fertile area for personal development and counseling programs. It's hard to concentrate at work when your home life is in turmoil

SCORING GUIDELINES

Excellent, scoring 8 or more

Good, scoring 7 or more

Fair, scoring 5 or 6

Poor, scoring less than 5

‘Pass mark’ on all parameters 7/10.


	With a few exceptions, this is a reasonable result.	This is a patchy result. 50% of the group don't sleep as well as they would like. The first casualty of anxiety and low levels of fitness is sleep. Find out the cause of the problem. Exercise more, drink less.

	A poor result. Paul Pearsal in his book Superimmunity' said you need a 21 day away from home holiday every year.	Not a good result. Too many people are not keeping themselves in the shape they'd like to be in - and which they need to be in. Exercise is the great stress reliever.

	This is a reasonable result. 25% would like a more balanced life.	A poor result. Too many people don't take time off to switch off and get outside in the fresh air. This is a reflection of poor management - personal and organisational

	This is a fair result. No one on their death bed ever said 'I wish I'd spent more time at the office.' It is often the case that the people working the longest hours are women with young children. They have a shift before work, a shift at work, a shift after work and the graveyard shift as well. Organisations need to give special consideration to women with young children. Some of them need to make a family decision for one or both partners to work less hours; otherwise the stress can be just enormous.	Too many people are too busy to look after and nurture their Self.

	Very few people meditate. The reasons to do so are compelling.	Family life satisfaction is good for most, but not for some. 25% of people are struggling. maybe the EAP need to be involved.

Average score: 57. This is not a good score. People could do more to look after their Self. I recommend that people scoring less than 50 spend time with a counselor or life coach, or go to a personal development weekend to get themselves centred and grounded on looking after their Self - start doing the things unstressed people do to avoid becoming stressed.

CAREER SATISFACTION PROFILE

The parameters in the profile relate to a mix of factors influences by the participant, management and their colleagues.

• How close are you to doing the job you’d really like to be doing?

• Are you in the right job for now?

• Is work giving you life or sucking life out of you?

• Are you focused on your career options?

• Do you get good feedback from your manager?

• Do you receive an appropriate financial reward?

• Do you feel you and your work are valued and appreciated?

• Do you work for an organisation that cares about people?

• Do you enjoy the company of the people you work with?

• What’s the level of morale like in your work group?

Normally, when results on the overall career profile are less than 70/100, people agree that they’re not in the right job. Certainly those scoring less than 60 have sufficient issues relating to career management as to seriously consider going somewhere else.

SCORING GUIDELINES

Excellent, scoring 8 or more

Good, scoring 7 or more

Fair, scoring 5 or 6

Poor, scoring less than 5

‘Pass mark’ on all parameters 7/10.


	This profile can only be described as fair. For many people it's poor. 13 people didn't know what they wanted to do when they grew up! Too many are miles away from their ideal job. This is why the scores in the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile suggest over 25% of people are in the wrong job and under-appreciated at work.	With a few exceptions this is a very good result. Now to find the people who are not happy and assist them to get the job they'd love to be doing.

	Work is probably about as stressful as you want it to be. Walk away. Make appointments for your Self that allow you to get on with your work unhindered by interruptions. Find the job you'd love to do. Managers need to ferret around and find out who the people are who scored less than 6 - and do something about it.	A fair result. For those who scored 7/10 it didn't matter.

	Despite the tail, this is a good result, a pleasing result. Of all our profile questions, this one is usually the worst answered. In this organisation this was not the case. Most managers appear to be doing a good job, though in 6 months we can expect a better result. For staff our recommendation is always to manage up. Take your manager out for morning tea once a month and talk about yourself and your work. Get some regular feedback. Don't wait for the big one at the end of the year. If you manager doesn't have time for you, get another one!	With a few exceptions, these people are pretty satisfied with what they sell themselves for. If you're not happy, you're selling yourself short. Log onto Seek, get your suit dry cleaned and polish your shoes!

	This is a pretty good result. 35% though are below the 7/10 pass mark, so there is some work to do.	his is also a pretty good result. The aim is to have all staff recording a score of 7 or more.

	This is a good score. In the main, people like working with each other. We rarely see scores like this. This is a cohesive workforce. The 4 people down the left hand end of the graph could be the odd one's out!	In the main, morale is pretty good, though the tail needs attention. 45% scored less than 7/10 so there's work to be done by 'them' 'us' and 'me'. It's generally the case that our morale is good when my morale is good. The exceptions need to be dealt with.

Average score: 70. It's a good result but too many people scored less than 70. For those scoring in the 60's there's the whisp of a suggestion they're not in the right job. It's redeemable. For those scoring less than 60 there's a strong suggestion they're not in the right job. Less than 50 and it must be a tough assignment to front up for work each day. It's up to managers top find these people and assist them to go to a place where they can be richly fulfilled by their job and their career.

The Buddha and Confucius both said 'Find the job you'd love to do and you don't have to do another days work in your life.'

RECOMMENDATIONS

See the generic list of recommendations that cover all our profiles.