![]() |
|
| Results DM March 2006 |
|
John Miller conducted a two-hour Seven Habits of Fit and Healthy People seminar in March 2006.
Participants completed the Mind and Body, Stress and Career Satisfaction profiles.
The results are presented in graphic format, with an abridged commentary.
CONTEXT The health seminar and assessment program conducted by Miller Health is based on the premise that the health of key body systems depends on
• physical fitness • diet and • an ability to manage the stress of both life and work.
Within the Australian community, there is currently an epidemic of body system dysfunctions which when translated into the workplace are associated with increased absenteeism and workers compensation, and decreased work performance and productivity.
There are very few organisations that are immune from this epidemic.
THE PROGRAM The program consisted of a two hour seminar, during which time people completed a number of health-related profiles.
The seminar took an holistic look at health, being based on the premise that the major systems of the body maintain healthy function when they are supported by
HEALTH PROFILES The Mind and Body profile was used as a way of obtaining a snap shot of people’s health, fitness and stress levels. In the workplace it is also a good measure of the risk of absenteeism, presenteeism and workers’ compensation.
People in poor shape experience • headaches • poor sleep • lack of energy and vitality • musculo-skeletal dysfunction • frequent colds and flu • obesity • reduced libido • anxiety ...
Other profiles included
• stress risk - based on the habits of unstressed people • career satisfaction
Sample Because of the nature of the sample selection, it is not appropriate to make organisation-wide generalizations about health and fitness.
OH&S risk management Overall we rated the health of the group as not bad. We deduce from the scores that a few people lacked energy, got frequent headaches, had sore shoulders, necks and backs, were anxious and not very fit.
The aging population We believe (barring disability) there is nothing stopping anyone of working age from being in exceptionally good physical condition – except lack of training. It's not so much that we have an aging population but a lazy population. We know this is the case because according to the principle of increased dysfunction, people are getting older younger!
Theoretically, as people get older they should be able to maintain a high level of fitness – they’ve had longer to train!
The Governments of Australia base their medical system data on the fact that as people get older they become more dysfunctional. Whilst this may be the case for people over the age of 75, it is not necessarily the case for people of working age . As a general rule, poor health and body system dysfunction goes hand in hand with low levels of physical activity, junk food diets, over-consumption of alcohol, an inability to handle the normal stresses of life and a job that does not suit their personality, intelligence strengths or interests.
MIND AND BODY PROFILE The Mind and Body profile provides people with a very good idea of how well the various systems of the body are functioning, particularly the
• the mind • autonomic nervous system • immune system • digestive system • circulatory system • elimination system • musculo-skeletal system.
On this profile, the lower the score the better.
To complete the profile, circle the number appropriate to the degree to which you experience the symptoms on the left hand side of the page. The greater the symptom, the higher the score.
The score of a normal, fit and healthy human being is less than 20
Higher scores are symptomatic of dysfunction of one or more body systems.
People with high levels of stress usually score well over 100.
For people with a score of more than 80, the ‘background noise’ of their life is becoming louder and louder. It is hard to concentrate on your work when body systems are dysfunctional.
We know a fit and healthy group when we see the majority of scores below 40. This was not the case with this group. By and large higher scores are usually a reflection of
• low levels of fitness • an inability to deal with what life and work are serving up to them.
Remember, it is not what happens, but how we deal with what happens that determines our level of stress.
This profile is not bad. We've seen worse and we've seen better. The average score was 64. Theoretically, for a fit and healthy group of people it should peak in the 30’s and then tail off to the 60’s.
How well you score on the Mind and Body profile will provide you with a good indication of how fit and healthy you really are.
I read somewhere that we don't see full blown body system dysfunction until the particular system is 70% dysfunctional. What the Mind and Body profile does is pick up the dysfunctions at an early stage - (you know something's wrong and you feel dreadful but you can't put your finger on the particular system that's causing it. It doesn't matter that you don't know the precise system involved. What you are aware of is that one or more of your systems isn't working at full pitch. The good news is that you can restore function to normal by getting fitter, eating wisely, getting the job you'd love to do ...)
Being vigorously physically active on a regular and systematic basis is the most powerful symbol of your ability to give back to your Self. On top of that it protects the body from a wide range of dysfunctions and contributes to an enhancement of the body's own recuperative powers.
There is an epidemic of body system dysfunction in our community and it is not caused by a lack of Panadol, Avpro, Diabex, Lipitor, Ventolin, Milantin, Celebrex, Valium, Zoloft, Viagra or Anusol!
The mind/body relationship The body is an ecosystem of which the mind is an integral part. Major body systems are frequently negatively affected by stress generated in the mind. The body is incapable of dishonesty!
On the other hand, the mind is effected by the healthy working order of other body systems. Certainly it is affected by physical activity, a good diet, meditation and a low-toxic environment.
People who are physically fit are less likely to become depressed. They are also more likely to have a strong immune system and an autonomic nervous system that is balanced and healthy in its management of key physiological responses. They are healthy and happy. They have normal blood pressure, they sleep like logs, are about their ideal weighty, rarely, if ever get a headache and don't have a crook back.
As your fitness level improves you can be certain that your score on the Mind and Body profile will also. When you score less than 20 report back.
STRESS PROFILE Participants completed a simple stress and relaxation profile designed to assist them in making an assessment of how they were affected by stress. It is based on the habits of unstressed people.
If you do what unstressed people do you are less at risk of becoming stressed. I’m yet to see someone who said they were highly stressed or depressed who got a high score on this profile. A good score is over 70.
• How would you rate your current stress level • Do you get a good night’s sleep? • Do you take your holidays? • Are you keeping yourself fit and healthy? • Is there balance in your life? • Do you take time off at lunch time? • How many hours a week do you work? • Are you good at giving back to your Self? • Do you meditate? • Are you happy with your family (and romantic) life?
If you look at the profiles you’ll see that some people
• lack an ability to manage stress • don’t get a good night’s sleep • don’t take a good long holiday every year • aren’t keeping themselves fit and healthy to the best of their ability • don’t take time off a lunch time to stretch their legs, fart and get a whiff of fresh air • don’t give back to their Self • aren't particularly happy with their family life.
Quite a few aren't working sensible hours, though some of these people are women who work three shifts, one at home in the morning, one at work and another at home at night.
Most people don’t meditate – there is as compelling a reason to meditate as there is to be physically active.
The matter of stress always needs to be addressed by organisations as part of a personal development thrust, and aimed at all staff. If stress management type programs are to be conducted, all staff need to be involved, otherwise those at most risk and those who are currently most stressed (and too wrapped up in their own busyness) will not attend.
For those who spend long hours at work, I often wonder whether the behaviour is externally or internally driven. I suspect the latter. No body on their death bed ever said 'I wish I'd spent more time at the office.'
A small number of people are struggling with their family life. This is another fertile area for personal development and counseling programs. It's hard to concentrate at work when your home life is in turmoil
SCORING GUIDELINES Excellent, scoring 8 or more Good, scoring 7 or more Fair, scoring 5 or 6 Poor, scoring less than 5 ‘Pass mark’ on all parameters 7/10.
On the whole this can only be described as a mediocre set of numbers. A lot of people aren’t consistently doing the things that unstressed people do. Good managers can have a dramatic impact on these scores by keeping in close touch with their staff.
Averaged out the stress score was 61.
CAREER SATISFACTION The parameters in the profile relate to a mix of factors influenced by the participant, management and their colleagues.
• How close are you to doing the job you’d really like to be doing? • Are you in the right job for now? • Is work giving you life or sucking life out of you? • Are you focused on your career options? • Do you get good feedback from your manager? • Do you receive an appropriate financial reward? • Do you feel you and your work are valued and appreciated? • Do you work for an organisation that cares about people? • Do you enjoy the company of the people you work with? • What’s the level of morale like in your work group?
Normally, when results on the overall career profile are less than 70/100, people agree that they’re not in the right job. Certainly those scoring less than 60 have sufficient issues relating to career management as to seriously consider going somewhere else.
When I look at the graphs I see several of distinct trends.
Overall the results are reasonable. The average score was 60. There is the suggestion that 40% or more of staff are in the wrong job. Some of the dissatisfaction is related to individual career choice and personal circumstances. Some is elated to management style and effectiveness. A lot of it is eminently fixable. It would be a pity to spoil the ship for a ha'p'orth of tar.
SCORING GUIDELINES Excellent, scoring 8 or more Good, scoring 7 or more Fair, scoring 5 or 6 Poor, scoring less than 5 ‘Pass mark’ on all parameters 7/10.
RECOMMENDATIONS See the generic list of recommendations.
John Miller
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||