Index

6. SLAPO MAY 15 2009

 

USEFUL LINKS

 

 

NEWSLETTER

 

 

FACT SHEETS

 

 

 

John Miller conducted a Health Management program for The Group in May 2009.

 

24 people, 14 men and 10 women completed the following profiles: -

 

Health, Fitness and Wellbeing

Elite force musculo-skeletal risk

Stress risk

Career satisfaction

 

The results are presented in graphic format, with commentary.

 

Click here to read what the assessments are all about  

 

HEALTH, FITNESS AND WELLBEING PROFILE

The Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile provides people with a very good idea of how well the various systems of the body are functioning, particularly the

 

•      the mind

•      autonomic nervous system

•      immune system

•      digestive system

•      circulatory system

•      elimination system

•      musculo-skeletal system.

 

 

 

Symptom

None

Not much

A fair bit

A lot

 
 

1.

Headaches including migraines

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

2.

Lack of energy and vitality

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

3.

Candida - jock itch, thrush, tinea ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

4.

Poor sleep. If on tablets score 10

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

5.

Snoring &/or sleep apnoea. Score 10 if using a mask

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

6.

Crook back, stiff neck, sore shoulders, dicky knee RSI ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

7.

Frequent colds, flu, sinus

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

8.

Unsettled stomach, reflux (Score 10 if on medication)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

9.

Overweight - 1 point for every 2Kg

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

10.

Irritable bowel, constipation

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

11.

Asthma

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

12.

Low level of aerobic fitness

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

13.

Chest pain, palpitations

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

14.

Rashes, itchiness, skin outbreaks, psoriasis ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

15.

Mouth ulcers, cold sores

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

16.

Elevated blood pressure. Score 0 on pills

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

17.

Elevated blood cholesterol. Score o if on pills

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

18.

Elevated blood glucose. Score 0 if on medication

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

19.

Shakes, nervous ticks, mannerisms

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

20.

Grinding teeth

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

21.

Alcoholic drinks per day (2 pts/drink)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

22.

Smoking. (1 pt/cigarette/day)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

23.

Caffeine (1 pt/cup per day)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

24.

Anxious about life, insecure, apprehensive

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

25.

Sad or depressed (On medication, score 0)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

26.

In wrong job for now

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

27.

Under-appreciated at work

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

28.

Have poor work/life balance

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

29.

Unhappy with family life

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

30.

Unhappy with financial status

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 

  Score

   

 

The score of a normal, fit and healthy human being is less than 20        

 

Higher scores are symptomatic of dysfunction of one or more body systems.

 

People with high levels of stress usually score well over 100.

 

For people with a score of more than 80, the ‘background noise’ of their life is becoming louder and louder. It is hard to concentrate on your work when body systems are dysfunctional.

 

We know a fit and healthy group when we see the majority of scores below 40. This was not the case with this group. By and large higher scores are usually a reflection of

 

•      low levels of fitness

•      an inability to deal with what life and work are serving up to people.

 

Remember, it is not what happens, but how we deal with what happens that determines our level of stress. 

 

Classification of average scores: Excellent - less than 40. Good - 41 - 50. Fair 51-60. Poor - over 60.

 

This profile is described as good. The average score was 42. This is the best score we've registered for a couple of years. Anyone scoring more than 80 is putting up with a lot of 'background noise'.

 

HEALTH CLIMATE SURVEY

Based on scores received in the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing profile we've compiled a Health Climate Survey. Scores on each item have ranked - the higher the score the worse the problem.

 

We registered those scores of 5 and over as being a symptom, issue or concern, the most pressing of which have been highlighted. We added the scores for each item. The results appear in the table below.

Compared with other groups we've surveyed the number of symptoms/issues/concerns over 20% (highlighted) is not high and revolve principally around issues relating to fitness - metabolic dysfunction (poor sleep, snoring and being over weight) and musculo-skeletal dysfunction.

 

This is the best Health Climate Survey set of r4esults we've seen for many years. There were very few symptoms/issues or concerns rating over 20%.

Symptoms/issues/concerns

% scoring

over 5

 

Overweight

29  

Poor sleep

25  

Low level of fitness

21  

Crook back, sore shoulders

17  

Elevated blood pressure

17 3

Alcohol

17  

Caffeine

13  

Financial status

13  

Lack of Energy

8  

Irritable bowel, constipation etc

8  

Smoking

8 2

Anxious

8  

Wrong job

8  

Work-life balance

8  

Unhappy family life

8  

Candida

4  

Snoring, sleep apnoea

4  

Reflux, unsettled stomach

4  

Itchy, rashes, psoriasis

4  

Elevated cholesterol

4  

Elevated glucose

4  

Grinding teeth

4  

Under appreciated at work

4  

Headaches

0  

Frequent colds, flu, sinus

0  

Shortness of breath from asthma

0  

Chest pain, palpitations

0  

Mouth ulcers

0  

Shakes, nervous mannerisms

0  

Depressed

0  

 

Perception

Based on people's perception (where they gave a particular symptom a score of 5 or more, and backed up by objective scores) the key issues are

 

•

 

Obesity

29% of people said they were more than 10Kg over weight. 2 people were more than 20Kg overweight. Obesity is a symptom of metabolic dysfunction and relates to high energy diets and low energy lifestyles. It's suggestive of elevated levels of insulin floating around the body, which is a precursor of all manner of body system dysfunctions - elevated blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, elevated blood glucose.

 

The recommendation, 29% of people need to get more exercise at lunch time and eat from the top of the Hourglass.

 

An elite force group should be sharper than this.

 

 

•

Poor sleep

25% of people said they did not sleep well. The first casualty of anxiety is sleep.

 

Poor sleep is a symptom of metabolic dysfunction. People need a good aerobic fitness training program.

 

Some people need less sleep than they think - go to bed later or get up earlier.

   

•

 

Lack of energy

8% of people said they lacked energy.

 

Low levels of energy come from many sources, including: -

-  lack of a good aerobic fitness training program

-  a diet high in wheat flour and sugar

-  dullness

-  ...

 

 

•

Fitness

21% said they were unfit. We recommend staff be given the greatest encouragement to maintain an acceptable level of fitness. For a start they'll feel better.

 

Fitness has a significant bearing on the scores for low levels of energy, poor sleep, snoring, depression and headaches.

 

 

•

Musculo-skeletal dysfunction

17% of people said they had some sort of musculo-skeletal dysfunction.

 

Musculo-skeletal dysfunction goes with low levels of strength and flexibility. Those at greatest risk need encouragement to attend a strength and flexibility training program several times a week.

 

 

•

Under-appreciation at work

Only 4% said they were under-appreciated at work.

 

Compared with other groups this is a very good result.

 

 

•

Being in the wrong job

Only 8% of people said they were in the wrong job.

 

Compared with other groups this is a very good result.

 

 

•

Depression and anxiety

There is an epidemic of depression in our community and we encourage all organisations to target depression.

 

Nobody said they were depressed. This is a good result.

 

There is a significant core of depression that relates to poor health generally.

 

All body systems are connected. The epidemic of depression will continue to escalate at the same rate as the epidemic of all other body system dysfunctions. People need to be given encouragement to exercise regularly and vigorous, eat less flour and sugar and imbibe less of the culturally chemicals - particularly nicotine, caffeine and alcohol.

 

Because of the relationship of depression to fitness and diet there is a chance that some people have been misdiagnosed.

 

Some aspects of depression relate to psychologically generated issues. It is important that these people be encouraged to have regular counselling - through the EAP or other counsellors -

 

The best book about depression I've read, and what you can do about it, and one that I recommend highly is by psychiatrist, David Servan-Schreiber, Healing Without Freud or Prozac.

 

 

•

Blood pressure

3 people indicated they were on blood pressure medication. This is not good. More metabolic dysfunction that's not caused by a lack of Avpro!

 

Blood pressure is a symptom of body system dysfunction relating directly to

 

- lack of aerobic fitness

- being over weight

- being stressed.

 

 

•

Smoking

There were 2 confirmed smokers. Now lets move heaven and earth to assist these people to give it away altogether.

   

•

Alcohol intake

17% of people indicated a higher than acceptable level of alcohol consumption. I don't think it is a big problem.

 

Not only does willpower dissolve in alcohol but it increases the size of the waist.

 

MUSCULO-SKELETAL RISK

Our musculo-skeletal risk factor profile looked at a range of parameters including mobility, strength and flexibility and whether people are training to keep themselves strong and flexible.

 

The musculo-skeletal risk factor profile is comprised of a mix of 7 objective and 3 subjective assessments.

•      Current musculo-skeletal condition

•      Abdominal strength test

•      Upper body strength test

•      Flexibility

•      Functional mobility – the ability to sit down and stand up with ease.

•      Shoulder function

•      Dominant hand grip

•      Non-dominant hand grip

•      Flexibility training behaviour

•      Strength training behaviour

 

A score of 70% is attainable by those who have a regular and systematic training program.

 

Those scoring less than 70 are not doing sufficient in the way of strength and flexibility exercises. They are therefore exposing themselves to a high risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction. (It would be bizarre for a workplace to offer to pay the rehabilitation costs of people who were not keeping themselves strong enough or flexible enough to do their job without succumbing to musculo-skeletal dysfunction, wouldn't it?)

 

 

A mediocre result. Too many people are experiencing some pain and discomfort. Those scoring less the 6 are encouraged to attend a prehab/rehab program, for their own benefit and that of the organisation.

 

As a group this is a reasonable result. 40% were 10 or more kilos over their ideal weight. Being overweight greatly compromises mobility. This is not an elite force score.

 

Generally speaking a good result. However, 1 person couldn't do 1 squat.

 

This is a poor result. Most people couldn't do 40 situps with their feet held. This means that the strength of the muscles on the front of their body is not sufficient to keep their pelvis and spinal column in good alignment.

 

This is a fair result. 6 people couldn't touch their toes at all. These people have tight muscles along the back side of their body - calves, hamstrings, buttock and back. It's caused by two things - sitting down and not having a flexibility program. There is a high risk of lower back and neck dysfunction.

 

 

This is a poor result. Most people could not do 40 pressups. They are leaving themselves open to upper back, shoulder and arm dysfunction.

 

A fair result. 4 many people had difficulty getting down on the floor and back up again. Being overweight and having a game leg, bung hip and a crook back dramatically reduces mobility.

 

A mediocre result. 45% of people had some form of shoulder dysfunction.

 

Its always the case, few people have a regular strength and flexibility program.

Average score: 50. Not good. These people are not in particularly good shape for an elite force group. The risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction is high due to low levels of strength and flexibility. Those who scored less than 60 are encouraged to take part in a regular strength and flexibility training program .

 

By far and away a high proportion of people do not have a strength and flexibility program. As a result they are getting weaker and tighter by the week, thereby exposing themselves and the organisation to risk.

 

In our opinion musculo-skeletal dysfunction caused by lack of a regular and systematic strength and flexibility program cannot be classified as an injury.

 

We recommend a range of strength and flexibility classes that are readily available Australia-wide: -

 

•

Posture and Flexibility

•

Yoga

•

Crookback Clinic

•

Tai Chi

•

Pontius Pilates

 

The lack of strength and flexibility training coupled with poor abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility and shoulder function is a cause for concern and needs the attention of individual staff and managers.  

Recommendation

We strongly recommend that the people who are in current poor musculo-skeletal condition, and who lack abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility, shoulder function and functional mobility, in particular those who scored less than 60 on the profile, to attend regular strength and flexibility classes.

STRESS RISK PROFILE

Participants completed a simple stress and relaxation profile designed to assist them in making an assessment of how they were affected by stress. It is based on the habits of unstressed people.

 

If you do what unstressed people do you are less at risk of becoming stressed. I’m yet to see someone who said they were highly stressed or depressed who got a high score on this profile. A good score is over 70.

 

•      How would you rate your current stress level

•      Do you get a good night’s sleep?

•      Do you take your holidays?

•      Are you keeping yourself fit and healthy?

•      Is there balance in your life?

•      Do you take time off at lunch time?

•      How many hours a week do you work?

•      Are you good at giving back to your Self?

•      Do you meditate?

•      Are you happy with your family (and romantic) life?

  

The matter of stress always needs to be addressed by organisations as part of a personal development thrust, and aimed at all staff. If stress management type programs are to be conducted, all staff need to be involved, otherwise those at most risk and those who are currently most stressed (and too wrapped up in their own busyness) will not attend.

 

For those who spend long hours at work, I often wonder whether the behaviour is externally or internally driven. I suspect the latter. No body on their death bed ever said 'I wish I'd spent more time at the office.'

 

A few people are struggling with their family life. This is another fertile  area for personal development and counseling programs. It's hard to concentrate at work when your home life is in turmoil

 

SCORING GUIDELINES

Excellent, scoring 8 or more

Good, scoring 7 or more

Fair, scoring 5 or 6           

Poor, scoring less than 5

‘Pass mark’ on all parameters 7/10.   

   
 

This is a patchy result.

  This is a patchy result.  Around half the participants didn't get a good night's sleep. The first casualty of anxiety and low levels of fitness is sleep. The first causality of anxiety is poor sleep. Find out the cause of the problem. Exercise more, drink less.
   
 

A poor result. Paul Pearsal in his book Superimmunity' said you need a 21 day away from home holiday every year. 90% of people had 20 or more years long service leave up their sleeve. Not good!

 

Not a good result. Too many people are not keeping themselves in the shape they'd like to be in - and which they need to be in. If you want to feel better, get fit!

   
 

With some exceptions this is a reasonable result.

 

A poor result. Too many people don't take time off to switch off and get outside in the fresh air. This is a reflection of poor management - personal and organisational

   
 

This is a poor result. Too many people are working extra long hours. No one on their death bed ever said 'I wish I'd spent more time at the office.' The people working the longest hours may be women with young children who have a shift before work, a shift at work, a shift after work and the graveyard shift as well.

 

Too many people are too busy to look after and nurture their Self.

   
 

Very few people meditate. The reasons to do so are compelling.

 

Family life satisfaction is good for most people, but not for some. The tail suggests the organisation could encourage staff with family problems to go to the employee assistance program for advice and support.

Average score: 53. This is indeed an average sort of a score.  People could do more to look after their Self. I recommend that people scoring less that 50 spend time with a counselor or life coach, or go to a personal development weekend to get themselves centred and grounded on looking after their Self - start doing the things unstressed people do to avoid becoming stressed.

 

CAREER SATISFACTION PROFILE

The parameters in the profile relate to a mix of factors influences by the participant, management and their colleagues.

 

•      How close are you to doing the job you’d really like to be doing?

•      Are you in the right job for now?

•      Is work giving you life or sucking life out of you?

•      Are you focused on your career options?

•      Do you get good feedback from your manager?

•      Do you receive an appropriate financial reward?

•      Do you feel you and your work are valued and appreciated?

•      Do you work for an organisation that cares about people?

•      Do you enjoy the company of the people you work with?

•      What’s the level of morale like in your work group?

 

Normally, when results on the overall career profile are less than 70/100, people agree that they’re not in the right job. Certainly those scoring less than 60 have sufficient issues relating to career management as to seriously consider going somewhere else.

 

SCORING GUIDELINES

Excellent, scoring 8 or more

Good, scoring 7 or more

Fair, scoring 5 or 6           

Poor, scoring less than 5

‘Pass mark’ on all parameters 7/10. 

 

   
 

This is a good score - except for the tail. 1 person didn't know what they wanted to do when they grew up! My encouragement to people who scored less than 6 is to move heaven and earth to work out what it is they really want to do - and develop a plan to get there as soon as they can.

  This is a good result. Good managers can find out who the few people scoring less than 6/10 are and assist them to move to the job they'd really like to have.
   
 

Overall a poor result. Work is meant to give life to you, not suck life out of you. Work is probably about as stressful as you want it to be. Walk away. Make appointments for your Self that allow you to get on with your work unhindered by interruptions.

 

With a few exceptions this is a good result. For those who scored 7/10 it didn't matter.

   
 

This is a fair to middling result. 45% of staff were not happy with the amount of feedback. Of all our profile questions, this one is usually the worst answered. In this organisation there's some extra work for managers. For staff our recommendation is always to manage up. A lot of managers fall into the trap of getting on with their own work rather than seeing the principal function of their work being to manage their staff. Some don't have the personality, the confidence, the know-how or the aptitude. So, manage up. Take your manager out for morning tea once a month and talk about yourself and your work. Get some regular feedback. Don't wait for the big one at the end of the year. If you manager doesn't have time for you, get another one!

 

With a few exceptions, these people are pretty satisfied with what they sell themselves for. If you're not happy, you're selling yourself short. Log onto Seek and get your suit dry cleaned!

   
 

This is a good result. For the most part, work is valued and appreciated.

 

This is a fair result The aim is to have all staff recording a score of 7 or more.

   
  This is a very good score. People like working with each other. We rarely see scores like this.   Morale is good. It's generally the case that our morale is good when my morale is good. The exceptions need to be dealt with.

Average score: 69. Compared with other groups, this can only be described as a fair, result.  For people who score less than 70, there is the whiff of a suggestion they're not in the right job. The situation is certainly redeemable. For people scoring less than 60 the smell is becoming distinctly stronger, but it's still redeemable.  Being in the wrong job sucks all vitality out of you.

 

For those who are in the wrong job there are several options; change your manager, change yourself or change your job.

The Buddha and Confucius both said 'Find the job you'd love to do and you don't have to do another days work in your life.'