WorkHealth, Fitness and Wellbeing

Healthy people, healthy workplace

 

X

About us Contact us News Events
  THE WORKHEALTH FITNESS AND WELLBEING ORGANISATION  

 

WorkHealth Home

Aim

Best Practice

Research Findings

Targets

Rationale

Policy

Management System

Budget

Manifesto

Benefits

Programs

Assessments

Audit Reports

Absenteeism
Presenteeism
Workers' Compensation

 Prehab

Rehab

Stress management

Smoking cessation

Recruitment

Newsletter

Ebooks

Fact Sheets

Links

Awards

ROY SHEPHERD - CANADIAN RESEARCHER

1986 'Fitness and Health in Industry', in Journal of Medicine and Sport Science, Vol 21.

x

Canada Life Survey - based on 200 random fitness centre participants.

84% reported significantly better health

9% reported lower stress 74% reported better self image

63% reported better work attitude

54% reported weight loss 7% rise in productivity

 

Absenteeism

 

People's Credit Jewelers dropped 23%

Goodyear Tyres in Sweden, 50% less

Dallas Police Force, 29% less

Metropolitan Life Insurance, 47% decrease

New York State Education Department, 40% decrease in sick leave.

Dallas Police Force cut sick leave and reduced incidence of low back problems after 6 month fitness program.

Johnson & Johnson decrease in sick day

 

Productivity

 

 

Four hours of exercise improved work performance and objective ratings

of attention and concentration in telegraph workers.

 

4% increase in productivity on Ontario Health Insurance Plan data process operators

 

Dallas Police Force noted a 39% increase in officer commendations after
a 6 month fitness program


Back dysfunction

Although some industrial injuries arise from external trauma, the most common problem is internal trauma, usually affecting the spine.

 

 

Contributing factors include poor posture, obesity, lack of physical fitness and faulty technique. The prophylactic importance of good muscle condition is suggested by that fact that injuries are most common in industries where lifting is not a regular occurrence.

 

HEALTH CANADA

A healthy workplace ... it's money in the bank.

 

Research shows that healthy employees in a safe, healthy and supportive workplace help businesses to keep a competitive edge. You will:

  • get – and keep – the best employees

  • keep absenteeism rates down

  • encourage employees to be fully productive

  • reduce the number of injury and illness claims

  • encourage a higher quality of work, more creativity and better client service

Many organizations recognize that healthy people are valuable assets to the company, and that taking an active approach to the health and well being of their employees gets results. Helping people who work for and with you to be physically and mentally healthy can have many benefits. Creating a healthy work environment can:

  • increase morale

  • increase productivity

  • result in fewer accidents and compensation claims

  • create a healthier workplace culture

  • enhance recruiting potential and ability to keep valued employees

  • reduce personal and organizational health care expenses, and

  • reduce absenteeism due to illness.

AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF HEALTH AND WELFARE

October 2005

 

Obesity, ill-health and days away from work

Obesity can place undue strain on the heart, joints and spine, increase the risk of high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes and other conditions, and may contribute to workplace absenteeism according to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).

 

Obesity and workplace absenteeism among older Australians examines the relationship between obesity and workplace absenteeism in almost 10,000 employed men and women, using data from Australia's 2001 National Health Survey.

 

The analysis indicates that in general obese workers are more likely to be absent from work due to personal illness or injury than non-obese workers, and for a longer time when they are.

 

Obese employees were 17% more likely than non-obese employees to have been absent from work as a result of illness or injury at least one day during the two weeks prior to being interviewed.

 

Of people who missed work for these reasons, obese employees tended to have more days off than non-obese employees - four days compared to three days.

 

These differences suggest that absenteeism related to illness or injury associated with obesity may account for over 4 million lost work days per year.

 

Also of note was the discovery that obese people were 8% more likely to be 'not in the labour force' than non-obese people and the issue appears to compound with age.

 

Mature age workers (defined as 45-64 years) comprise almost a third of the Australian labour force, yet older Australians who were obese were 20% less likely to be employed full-time than their non-obese counterparts.

 

Employees aged 55-64 were less likely to be absent from work for their own illness or injury than their younger counterparts but were away for longer when they were absent, regardless of whether or not they were obese.

 

The evidence all suggests that obesity may be influencing absenteeism and preventing workers from staying in the workforce; most likely because of the strong correlation between obesity and chronic diseases and injury.

 

The issue of obesity, ill-health and workforce participation is particularly relevant in view of Australia's ageing population and the current debate about enabling mature age workers who want to continue to work, to do so.

 

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE  2003; 45: 1183–1195

Claxton et al. (8) found that absenteeism increased in each of the 6 months before a depression diagnosis and then decreased in each of the 6 months after the onset of drug treatment for depression. In an earlier analysis, Rizzo et al. (9) used National Medical Expenditure Survey data and showed that treatment for hypertension, heart disease, and depression led to substantial reductions in absenteeism-related expenditures.

 

 

A study of 35 employers by the Institute for Health and Productivity Management (10) showed a correlation between medical expenditures and absenteeism and presenteeism for musculoskeletal, mental health, respiratory, and gastrointestinal health problems.

 

MONASH UNIVERSITY

Literature review by Monash University examining workplace health and work performance. 152 studies world-wide.

 

 

UNHEALTHY

HEALTHY

 

• 18 days annual sick leave

• 49 effective hours worked/month

High fat dies

Low energy levels

Poor concentration

Poor sleep

Poor stress management

2days annual sick leave

143 effective hours worked/month

Healthy diet Fit,

 

Energetic and alert

More attentive at work

Better sleep

• More resilient

Close to idea weight.

 

OTHER STUDIES

 

 

 

Poor mental health increases absenteeism by 50% (Serxner et. al., JOEM, 43(4), 2001)

 

For every health risk an employee has, productivity drops by an average of 2.4% (Burton et. al. 2005)

 

Medical costs of those with 6 or more risk factors are eight times higher than those with none (Chapman, L. Summex Corporation, 2002)

Workers Compensation costs for high risk employees are 12 times greater than those of low risk employees (Musich et. al. JOEM, June 2001, 534-541)

 

 

MEDIBANK PRIVATE STUDY - 3620 employees

Health profile of corporate Australia

 

 

 

10% are completely inactive

53% of workforce is stressed

40% engage in only minimal exercise

62% are overweight

56% report not getting enough sleep

28% clinically obese as defined by WHO

46% live on high fat diets

21% have experienced a medical condition in the last 12 months

12% of the 21% have reported being depressed

22% report feeling exhausted at work

 

 

Employees with poor overall health are nine times more likely to have sick days compared to healthy employees. This is 18 days a year compared with 2 days a year.

 

The major contributors to absenteeism are

  smoking

  drinking

  inactivity

  excess weight.

 

SUMMEX corporate health management organisation (USA)

Effectiveness of corporate health programs based on 42 studies involving over 500,000 employees.

  28% reduction in sick leave

  26% reduction in health costs

  Cost/Benefit Ratio $1 spent saves $5.63

 

Summex said it has helped various clients achieve such results as a

  50 percent reduction in the growth of health-care costs

  29 percent rate of smokers who quit

  41 percent decrease in missed work days

  20 percent improvement in the wellness scores of the highest health risk

    employees.

 

RETURN ON INVESTMENT

Summex:  Cost/Benefit Ratio $1 spent saves $5.63

 

PepsiCo: “Wellness Program” 300% return on investment"

 

Dupont had a return of $2.05 for every $1.00 invested in its employee wellness program

 

Bank of America ROI $6 for every $1 spent on its health promotion program

 

Boral “Bwell Program” ROI $3.8 for every $1 spent and improving

 

Treasury Corporation Australia: Significant Increase in CSI, Reduced Absenteeism 2001 figure improved by 20%, Improved Staff Retention. ROI estimated $15 for every $1 spent.

 

MILLER HEALTH - September 2007

In it's most recent report, (August 2006) the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare said that the health of Australians is getting better. We beg to differ, loudly. Our results speak for themselves. Here are the compelling reasons why you need a regular and systematic corporate health, fitness and wellbeing program. You can read more about the reasons for developing such a program on this link.

 

Participants completed the Health, Fitness and Wellbeing Profile (see below the results table). If people scored more than 5 on the profile, we registered their score as being one that needed to be flagged as a risk.

Key Issues

Based on people's perception (where they gave a particular symptom a score of 5 or more), underpinning the symptoms/issues/concerns are three key issues: Fitness, Diet and Stress.

 

Completing the profile

Participants complete the profile, by circling the number appropriate to the degree to which they experience the symptoms on the left hand side of the page. The greater the symptom, the higher the score.

 

Symptoms/issues/concerns

% of people

scoring 5 or

more

 
     

Musculo-skeletal dysfunction

55

 

Aerobic Fitness 

48

 

Lack of energy

45

 

Poor sleep

43

 

Overweight

42

 

Anxious

31

 

Wrong job

30

 

Under appreciated at work

29

 

Snoring

28

 

Insecure

27

 

Headaches

24

 

Crook gut

23

 

Under appreciated at home

20

 

Alcohol

19

 

Low libido

19

 

Caffeine

19

 

Depressed

19

 

Colds and flu

18

 

Rashes

18

 

Grinding teeth

18

 

Irritable bowel

18

 

Blood pressure

16

 

Unhappy family

16

 

Smoking

12

 

Candida

12

 

Mouth ulcers

9

 

Asthma

8

 

Shakes

8

 

Migraines

7

 

Chest pain

7

 

 

Completing the profile

Participants complete the profile, by circling the number appropriate to the degree to which they experience the symptoms on the left hand side of the page. The greater the symptom, the higher the score.

 

 

 

Symptom

None

Not much

A fair bit

A lot

 
 

1.

Headaches

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

2.

Migraines

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

3.

Lack of energy and vitality

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

4.

Candida - jock itch, thrush, tinea ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

5.

Poor sleep. If on tablets score 10

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

6.

Snoring &/or sleep apnoea.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

7.

Crook back, sore shoulders, RSI ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

8.

Frequent colds, flu, sinus

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

9.

Reflux

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

10.

Irritable bowel, constipation, trots ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

11.

Overweight - 1 point for every 2Kg

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

12.

Asthma

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

13.

Low level of aerobic fitness

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

14.

Chest pain, palpitations

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

15.

Rashes, itchiness, psoriasis, zits

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

16.

Mouth ulcers, cold sores

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

17.

Elevated blood pressure. (On medication score 10)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

18.

Reduced libido

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

19.

Shakes, nervous ticks, mannerisms

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

20.

Grinding teeth

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

21.

Alcoholic drinks per day (2 pts/drink)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

22.

Smoking. (1 pt/cigarette/day)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

23.

Caffeine (1 pt/cup per day)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

24.

Anxious about life in general

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

25.

Insecure/apprehensive about the future

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

26.

Sad or depressed (On medication, score 10)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

27.

In wrong job for now

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

28.

Under-appreciated at work

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

29.

Under-appreciated at home

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

30.

Unhappy with family and romantic life

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 

 

The score of a fit and healthy person is less than 20.

 

We have produced a frequency histogram of the scores of the 956 people.

 

 

Classification of average scores: Excellent - less than 30. Good - 31 - 50. Reasonable 51-60. Poor - over 60.

 

The graph shows that by far the majority of people are in poor condition. The average score was 74. Anyone scoring more than 80 is putting up with a lot of 'background noise'.

 

In fit and healthy workplaces the average score is in the 40's and the graph peaks in the 30's.

 

MILLER HEALTH Musculo-Skeletal Health Survey - March 2009

This March 2009 report is based on the results of 953 people who’ve completed the Musculo-skeletal Risk Factor profile in 2008 and 2009.

 

CURRENT CONDITION

Score/100

Exceptionally good nick - (10/10) - 30 people (.3%) - average total score 73. They’re keeping themselves in good shape.

 

Only 30 people (.3%) out of 953 gave themselves a score of 10/10. This is an exceptionally low number and says something about the poor musculo-skeletal health of the Australian community.

 

 

73

 

 

Pretty good nick - Those scoring more than 7/10 - 329 people (35) - average score was 65.

 

These people are keeping themselves in pretty good nick. Most of them don’t have a regular and systematic strength and flexibility training program but they are still strong and flexible enough to keep their pelvis and spinal column in good alignment.

 

 

65

 

 

People in pain - those scoring less than 6/10 - 510 people (54%) - average score 456.

 

It sticks out like the proverbial. These people are in poor shape. They are not strong or flexible and they don’t have a strength and flexibility training program.

 

 

45

 

 

People scoring 0 for current condition: - 15 people (.15%) - average total score 26.

 

26

 

 

BODY COMPOSITION

Score/100

Ideal weight: -  192 people (20%) - average total score 65

65

 

 

Less than 10Kg over weight: - 508 people (53%) - average total score 61

 

61

 

 

10 - 14 Kg overweight: - 238 people (25%) - average total score 50

 

50

 

 

15 - 19kg over weight: - 82 people (8%) - average total score 40

40

 

 

20Kg or more over weight:  - 127 people (13%)  - average total score 36

 

36

 

STRENGTH

Score/100

Squat test of leg strength

 

People who did 15 or more squats - 394 people (41%) - average score - 63

 

63

 

 

People who couldn’t do a squat - 71 people (7%) - average score 30

30

 

 

Situp test of front of body strength

 

People who did 25 or more situps - 91 people (9%) - average score 72

 

72

 

 

People who couldn’t do 1 situp - 235 people (25%) - average score 38

 

38

 

 

Pressup test of upper body and arm strength

 

People who did 25 or more pressups - 110 people (11%) - average score 75

 

75

 

 

People who couldn’t do a pressup - 121 (13%) - average score  32

32

 

 

Discussion

People who lack leg, front of body and upper arm and shoulder strength are setting themselves up for musculo-skeletal dysfunction.

 

Improving the strength of these three body segments takes less than 3 minutes a day.

 

These three key exercises, together with Superman back arches are the exercises that need to be included in the 10 minute workplace exercise program at least 3 times a week.

  

Recommendation: institute a mandatory 10 minute daily strength and flexibility training program in the workplace, three or four minutes of which will involve strength exercises.

 

 

SHOULDER FUNCTION

Score/100

Those scoring 10/10 for shoulder function - 449people (47%) - had an average profile score of 60. The average number of pressups they could do was 15.

 

60

 

 

Those scoring less than 5/10 for shoulder function - 170 people (18%) - had an average profile score of 37. The average number of pressups they could do was 11.

 

37

 

 

Those scoring 0/10 for shoulder function - 24 people (.25%) - had an average profile score of 24. The average number of pressups they could do was 7.

 

Discussion

Weak shoulder and dysfunctional shoulders go together. You need to protect your staff from shoulder dysfunction otherwise it will definitely be diagnosed by their doctor as a work-related injury.

 

You can get a copy of the strength and flexibility exercises on this link:

 

http://www.globalbackcare.com/

 

 

24

 

 

STRENGTH TRAINING

 

People who had a strength training program that involved 3 or more sessions a week - 108 (11%) - had an average score of 77.

77

 

 

People who did not have a strength training program - 645 (67%) - had an average score of 48.

 

Discussion

The results speak for themselves.

48

 

 

FLEXIBILITY TRAINING

 

People who had a flexibility training program that involved 3 or more sessions a week - 49 people (5%) - had an average score of 80.

 

80

 

 

People who did not have a flexibility training program - 606 people (64%) - had an average score of 46.

 

Discussion

The results speak for themselves.

 

46

 

 

FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY

 

People who could sit down and stand up 15 or more times in 30 seconds - 292 people (31%) - average score 68.

 

68

 

 

People who couldn’t sit down and stand up: - 90 people (9%) - average total score 29.

 

29

 

Discussion

46% of people were more than 10Kg over weight. This is by their own assessment. A few would have erred on the side of leanness!

 

However once you get to 15 Kg over weight there seems to be a sharp decline in musculo-skeletal health. Being over weight in our culture usually means people don’t have a good aerobic exercise program; that’s a key reason why they’re over weight. The price of over-eating is to do more exercise. Anyone who runs for 40 minutes most days of the week usually looks like a greyhound.

 

Discussion

It’s useful to compare the mobility scores with all the other scores on all the items in the Musculo-skeletal Risk Profile.

 

 

 

Item

High mobility group. Score out of 10

Low mobility group. Score out of 10

 

 

Current condition

6.5

4.1

 

 

Closeness to ideal weight

8.0

4.3

 

 

Leg strength

9.0

5.4

 

 

Abdominal strength

6.5

2.5

 

 

Upper body and arm strength

7.7

3.0

 

 

Flexibility

5.9

2.5

 

 

Shoulder function

8.5

5.3

 

 

This table will confirm what your intuition has been telling you; people who are overweight, and lacking in strength and flexibility are at great risk of mobility problems. It’s not something that’s going to be fixed by physiotherapy, chiropractic, surgery or pills.

 

AUSTRALIAN HEALTH AND WELLBEING AWARDS 2007

Flight Centre has seen a 26% decrease in sick days - a saving of more than $500,000. Their unique Health and Wellness Index Reports compare individual wellness KPIs to profitability and productivity. Recent results have shown that the State with the highest health and wellness indicator also has the best staff retention and highest increase on budget profit!

 

The finalists offered an extensive range of health and wellbeing programs. Of note are:

 

The City of Brisbane's Well 4 Life Program with a dedicated Wellness Centre, which is a fully equipped gymnasium facility. Here professionally trained consultants deliver up to 26 classes a week and conduct personalised fitness assessments. The Recreational Fund enables employees to participate in self-nominated activities such as rock climbing and also Corporate Run programs such as Bridge to Brisbane fun run. Their extensive flexible work and leave options include fourteen weeks paid maternity, paternity and adoption leave as well as cultural and ceremonial leave.

 

The City of Playford’s building facilities providing fresh air recycling, interface between indoor and outdoor areas, large café areas for informal meetings, breast feeding facilities and ergonomically designed work stations. One outcome of the building design has been the growth of community between the inside and outside staff. Their Healthy Lifestyle Program provides skin screening and tests for nutrition, cardiovascular disease, waist to hip ratio, vision and stress to name a few.

 

The City of Melbourne’s Leap into Life program provides monthly forums and consultations on topics such as sleep awareness, managing grief, bone density testing, gender health, cancer awareness, financial management and healthy cooking. They also provide fresh fruit deliveries, medical rebates, day spa vouchers and classes in boxing, pilates, yoga, meditation and tai chi.

 

The overall winner of the Health and Wellbeing Award was Greenslopes Private Hospital’s Club Wellness members having a 24.8% lower rate of absenteeism.

 

Their outstanding range of policies, benefits and initiatives include facilities such as an on-site childcare centre, state-of-the-art Wellness Centre and on-site gymnasium; the incorporation of workload management strategies as part of the GPH Strategic Plan; tailored flexible work arrangements; a Wellness Ambassador Network; and 87.5% of management participation in their wellness program.